CVE-2026-4926
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImpact: A bad regular expression is generated any time you have multiple sequential optional groups (curly brace syntax), such as `{a}{b}{c}:z`. The generated regex grows exponentially with the number of groups, causing denial of service. Patches: Fixed in version 8.4.0. Workarounds: Limit the number of sequential optional groups in route patterns. Avoid passing user-controlled input as route patterns.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA ReDoS vulnerability exists where multiple sequential optional groups using curly brace syntax (e.g., {a}{b}{c}:z) in route patterns cause the generated regular expression to grow exponentially. This leads to catastrophic backtracking during regex processing, causing denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0.0, < 8.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed path-to-regexp versionRun 'npm list path-to-regexp' in your project directory, or inspect package.json dependenciesAffected if Version is >= 8.0.0 and < 8.4.0
-
Verify path-to-regexp is used in the applicationSearch source files for require('path-to-regexp') or import statements from 'path-to-regexp' or 'pillarjs/path-to-regexp'Affected if The application imports and uses path-to-regexp library
-
Inspect route definitions for vulnerable curly brace patternsSearch your route definition files for patterns containing multiple sequential optional groups in curly braces, such as {param1}{param2}{param3}:z or similar constructsAffected if Route patterns contain three or more sequential optional groups using curly brace syntax
You are affected if your project uses path-to-regexp version 8.0.0 through 8.3.x AND your codebase contains route definitions with multiple sequential optional groups using curly brace syntax like {a}{b}{c}:z.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.4.0
Upgrade to version 8.4.0 which contains the patch. As a workaround, limit the number of sequential optional groups in route patterns and avoid passing user-controlled input directly as route patterns.
8.4.0
- Check the current version of path-to-regexp in your project by reviewing package.json or running 'npm list path-to-regexp' or 'yarn list path-to-regexp'
- Upgrade path-to-regexp to version 8.4.0 or later using your package manager: 'npm install path-to-regexp@^8.4.0' or 'yarn upgrade path-to-regexp@^8.4.0'
- Run your test suite to verify the upgrade does not break existing functionality
- If you have routes using multiple sequential optional groups like {a}{b}{c}:z, verify they now generate safe regex patterns
- Deploy the updated application
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4926 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- cna.openjsf.org
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4926 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data