CVE-2026-49271
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedlibheif is a HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder. Prior to version 1.22.1, the uncompressed HEIF decoder validates explicit icef compressed-unit offsets using unit_offset + unit_size. Because the addition can wrap, a crafted HEIF file can pass the range check and then construct a vector from iterators outside the compressed item buffer, producing an out-of-bounds heap read and crash. Version 1.22.1 patches the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencelibheif's uncompressed HEIF decoder has an integer overflow vulnerability in its validation of icef compressed-unit offsets. The calculation unit_offset + unit_size can wrap around, allowing a crafted HEIF file to pass the range check but then construct a vector from iterators outside the compressed item buffer, resulting in an out-of-bounds heap read and crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.22.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if libheif is installedCheck for libheif library files on the system. On Linux, search for libheif files: find /usr -name 'libheif*' 2>/dev/null. On systems with package managers, check installed packages: dpkg -l | grep libheif (Debian/Ubuntu) or rpm -qa | grep libheif (RHEL/CentOS).Affected if libheif library is present on the system
-
Determine the installed libheif versionRun the heif-info tool if available: heif-info --version. Alternatively, check the library file version: ls -la /path/to/libheif.so.* or readelf -d /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libheif.so.* | grep SONAME. The version number is embedded in the filename or can be queried from the shared library.Affected if The reported version is less than 1.22.1 (for example, 1.22.0, 1.21.x, or earlier)
-
Identify applications or tools using libheifCheck which applications on the system may process HEIF files and link to libheif. Common tools include: imagemagick (identify -list format | grep -i heif), ffmpeg (ffmpeg -version shows heif support), gimp, or graphics utilities. Use ldd on binary executables to confirm libheif linkage: ldd /usr/bin/identify | grep heif.Affected if Applications that process HEIF images are installed and link to libheif
-
Verify if uncompressed HEIF decoding is in useThe vulnerability specifically affects uncompressed HEIF files using icef compressed-unit handling. Check if the system processes .heic or .heif files, particularly those that may be uncompressed (not AVC/H.265 encoded). Examine any image processing workflows, automated tasks, or services that handle HEIF files from untrusted sources.Affected if HEIF files are being decoded using libheif's uncompressed decoder path (icef compressed-unit handling)
The environment is affected if libheif version 1.22.1 or higher is not installed, AND HEIF image files are processed by applications that use libheif for decoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.22.1
Upgrade libheif to version 1.22.1 or later which patches the integer overflow in offset validation. Until then, exercise caution when processing HEIF files from untrusted sources.
libheif 1.22.1
- Check the currently installed libheif version using package manager commands (e.g., `dpkg -l | grep libheif` on Debian/Ubuntu, or `brew list libheif` on macOS)
- Upgrade libheif to version 1.22.1 or later. On Debian/Ubuntu: `sudo apt update && sudo apt install libheif1` or manually download from https://github.com/strukturag/libheif/releases/tag/v1.22.1
- On RHEL/CentOS/Fedora: `sudo dnf update libheif` or `sudo yum update libheif`
- If building from source, download version 1.22.1 from the GitHub releases page, rebuild, and reinstall the library
- Rebuild and restart any applications that depend on libheif to ensure they use the patched version
- Verify the fix by confirming the installed version is 1.22.1 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-49271 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-49271 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data