CVE-2026-49278
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRocket.Chat is an open-source, secure, fully customizable communications platform. Prior to 8.5.0, 8.4.2, 8.3.4, 8.2.4, 8.1.5, 8.0.6, 7.13.8, and 7.10.12, in the visitors.info endpoint, https://developer.rocket.chat/apidocs/get-visitor-information-by-id-1, token is returned in the response. It looks like there's no use case for the token to be present in the response and it would be a good security practice to remove it altogether. This vulnerability is fixed in 8.5.0, 8.4.2, 8.3.4, 8.2.4, 8.1.5, 8.0.6, 7.13.8, and 7.10.12.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRocket.Chat's visitors.info API endpoint incorrectly returns a visitor token in the response. This sensitive token should not be exposed as it could be used for visitor impersonation or session hijacking. The fix involves removing the token field from the API response.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Rocket.Chat installation and versionCheck the installed Rocket.Chat version via package manager, docker image tag, or by accessing the /api/info endpoint (GET /api/info) which returns version information in the response body.Affected if The installed version is older than 7.10.12, or falls between 7.10.12 - 7.13.7, 7.13.8 - 8.0.5, 8.1.0 - 8.1.4, 8.2.0 - 8.2.3, 8.3.0 - 8.3.3, 8.4.0 - 8.4.1, or 8.5.0 (which are all vulnerable versions).
-
Confirm visitors.info API endpoint accessibilityVerify the Rocket.Chat server is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS and that you have authentication credentials (user account) to make API calls to the server.Affected if The server is reachable and you have valid API credentials to query the visitors endpoint.
-
Test visitors.info endpoint for token exposureMake an authenticated API request to the visitors.info endpoint (GET /api/v1/visitors.info) with a valid visitorId parameter, then inspect the JSON response body for the presence of a 'token' field.Affected if The response contains a 'token' field with a value - this indicates the vulnerability is present and the sensitive token is being exposed.
A user is affected if their Rocket.Chat version is below the fixed releases AND the visitors.info API response contains an exposed visitor token field.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Rocket.Chat to version 8.5.0, 8.4.2, 8.3.4, 8.2.4, 8.1.5, 8.0.6, 7.13.8, or 7.10.12 or later, which removes the token from the visitors.info endpoint response.
Upgrade to Rocket.Chat 8.5.0 (or latest 8.x stable). For older major version branches, upgrade to 8.4.2, 8.3.4, 8.2.4, 8.1.5, 8.0.6, 7.13.8, or 7.10.12 as appropriate for your branch.
- 1. Backup your Rocket.Chat database and configuration before upgrading.
- 2. Review the release notes for the target version (e.g., 8.5.0 or 8.4.2) to check for any migration requirements or breaking changes.
- 3. Stop the Rocket.Chat service.
- 4. Upgrade Rocket.Chat to version 8.5.0 (or the latest 8.x stable release) using your deployment method (e.g., Docker, snap, or package manager).
- 5. Start the Rocket.Chat service.
- 6. Verify that the visitors.info endpoint no longer returns the token in the response.
- 7. Test that normal chat functionality continues to work as expected.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-49278 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-49278 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data