TeamcityApplication · Jetbrains

CVE-2026-49379

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-29
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2026.1 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2026.1 credentials could be exposed in thread names

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

In JetBrains TeamCity versions prior to 2026.1, sensitive credentials were being included in thread names, potentially exposing authentication secrets through thread dumps, logs, or monitoring tools that access thread information.

MitigationUpgrade TeamCity to version 2026.1 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement monitoring to detect credential patterns in thread names and restrict access to thread information.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
TeamcityApplication
Affected:< 2026.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed TeamCity version
    Check the TeamCity admin interface under Administration > Server Configuration, or locate the teamcity-version.txt file in the TeamCity data directory, or review buildServer.properties
    Affected if The version is any release prior to 2026.1
  2. Review thread dumps for credential exposure
    Obtain a thread dump through the TeamCity admin UI diagnostics, JMX console, or OS diagnostic tools. Search within the thread names for patterns resembling authentication tokens, API keys, session IDs, or user credentials
    Affected if Thread names contain authentication credentials, tokens, or sensitive session identifiers
  3. Search server logs for credential patterns in thread names
    Search TeamCity server logs (in the logs directory) for thread names that include authentication material such as 'token', 'auth', 'session', 'bearer', or credential-like strings
    Affected if Log entries display thread names with embedded credentials or tokens
  4. Audit monitoring and observability tools
    Review any external monitoring systems, APM tools, or log aggregation platforms that expose thread names. Search their outputs for thread names that may contain authentication information
    Affected if Monitoring outputs, dashboards, or trace data show thread names with exposed credentials

If running any TeamCity version below 2026.1 and thread dumps, logs, or monitoring outputs contain thread names with authentication credentials, the environment is affected by this vulnerability

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2026.1 or later
Fixed in 2026.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade TeamCity to version 2026.1 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement monitoring to detect credential patterns in thread names and restrict access to thread information.

Recommended fix High confidence

TeamCity 2026.1

  1. Backup your TeamCity installation and all data before upgrading
  2. Review the TeamCity 2026.1 release notes for any specific upgrade requirements or changes
  3. Upgrade your TeamCity installation to version 2026.1
  4. After upgrade, verify that credentials are no longer exposed in thread names by reviewing thread dumps or logs
Caveat Review TeamCity 2026.1 release notes for any breaking changes or migration requirements specific to your configuration

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Teamcity Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,080
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-49379 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-49379 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data