Information ExposureWeakness · CWE-200

CVE-2026-49397

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Nezha Monitoring is a self-hostable, lightweight, servers and websites monitoring and O&M tool. From version 2.0.0 to before version 2.0.14, private services (`EnableShowInService: false`) are enumerable via per-server endpoints, leaking name and timing data. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.14.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Nezha Monitoring versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.13 expose private services (those with EnableShowInService: false) through per-server API endpoints, allowing unauthenticated enumeration of service names and timing data that should be hidden.

MitigationUpgrade Nezha Monitoring to version 2.0.14 or later to patch the information disclosure vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Nezha Monitoring installation
    Check for Nezha Monitoring by looking for the executable or service. Common locations include /opt/nezha, /usr/local/nezha, or check running processes with 'ps aux | grep nezha' or 'systemctl list-units | grep nezha'
    Affected if Nezha Monitoring process or service is found running on the system
  2. Determine installed Nezha version
    Run 'nezha --version' or check the version file if present in the installation directory. Alternatively, check the Docker container tag if running via Docker
    Affected if Installed version is 2.0.0 through 2.0.13 inclusive
  3. Verify private services exist
    Examine the Nezha configuration for services with EnableShowInService: false setting, typically found in the dashboard configuration or YAML configuration files under the services section
    Affected if Configuration contains one or more services with EnableShowInService set to false
  4. Check API endpoint accessibility
    Attempt to access the per-server API endpoints (typically /api/v1/server/<server_id>/services or similar) without authentication to see if private service information is returned
    Affected if API endpoints return private service names or timing data without requiring authentication when EnableShowInService is false

You are affected if Nezha Monitoring versions 2.0.0-2.0.13 are running and private services with EnableShowInService: false exist, as these can be enumerated via unauthenticated API endpoints.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Nezha Monitoring to version 2.0.14 or later to patch the information disclosure vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

Version 2.0.14

  1. 1. Identify the current version of Nezha Monitoring installation by checking the application or deployment documentation
  2. 2. If running a version between 2.0.0 and 2.0.13 inclusive, plan for upgrade
  3. 3. Back up current configuration and data before upgrading
  4. 4. Upgrade Nezha Monitoring to version 2.0.14 or later release
  5. 5. After upgrade, verify that private services with EnableShowInService: false are no longer accessible via per-server endpoints
  6. 6. Test that monitoring functionality continues to work as expected
Caveat Review release notes for any configuration changes between current version and 2.0.14

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-49397 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-49397 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data