DompurifyApplication · Cure53

CVE-2026-49458

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.4.6 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Patch available 5 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
DOMPurify is a DOM-only cross-site scripting sanitizer for HTML, MathML, and SVG. Prior to 3.4.6, DOMPurify.sanitize(node, { IN_PLACE: true }) accepted same-origin foreign-realm DOM nodes while follow-on checks used parent-realm constructors, causing instanceof checks for forms, named node maps, document fragments, and elements to fail and skip clobber, template-content, and shadow-DOM sanitization branches so executable markup could survive. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

DOMPurify before 3.4.6 has a bypass vulnerability when using IN_PLACE mode with same-origin foreign-realm DOM nodes. The sanitizer accepts these nodes but subsequent instanceof checks for forms, named node maps, document fragments, and elements fail because they use parent-realm constructors instead of the foreign-realm constructors. This causes clobber, template-content, and shadow-DOM sanitization branches to be skipped, allowing executable markup to survive.

MitigationUpgrade DOMPurify to version 3.4.6 or later. No other configuration changes are required; the fix is included in the library update.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
DompurifyApplication
Affected:< 3.4.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify DOMPurify version
    Check package.json dependencies, or run DOMPurify.version in browser console, or inspect the DOMPurify script file for the VERSION property
    Affected if Version is lower than 3.4.6
  2. Locate IN_PLACE mode configuration
    Search codebase for DOMPurify.IN_PLACE = true or options object containing IN_PLACE: true passed to DOMPurify.sanitize()
    Affected if IN_PLACE mode is explicitly enabled in the code
  3. Identify foreign-realm DOM node usage
    Check if the sanitization input includes DOM nodes from a different realm (such as iframes, shadow DOM, or imported nodes from external documents)
    Affected if Input to DOMPurify.sanitize() contains same-origin foreign-realm nodes while IN_PLACE mode is active
  4. Check for affected node type processing
    Inspect sanitization input for presence of form elements, named node maps, document fragments, or shadow DOM content
    Affected if Any of these node types are present in input processed with IN_PLACE mode on a vulnerable version

You are affected if DOMPurify version is below 3.4.6 AND your code uses IN_PLACE mode with same-origin foreign-realm DOM nodes containing forms, named node maps, document fragments, or shadow DOM.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.4.6 or later
Fixed in 3.4.6
Vendor patch github.com →
Interim mitigation

Upgrade DOMPurify to version 3.4.6 or later. No other configuration changes are required; the fix is included in the library update.

Recommended fix High confidence

3.4.6

  1. Check current DOMPurify version in your project (npm list dompurify or yarn list dompurify)
  2. Update DOMPurify to version 3.4.6 or later using your package manager: npm install dompurify@^3.4.6 or yarn upgrade dompurify@^3.4.6
  3. Verify the new version is installed correctly
  4. Rebuild and test your application to ensure the sanitizer functions as expected
  5. Check for any deprecation warnings after upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Dompurify Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-49458 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-49458 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data