CVE-2026-49793
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based buffer overflow in Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally.
In the news
Third-party coverage- Microsoft July 2026 Patch Tuesday fixes massive 570 flaws, 3 zero-days
- Microsoft CVE Summary - Bleeping Computer
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) that allows a locally authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code by exploiting improper bounds checking during file system operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9339< 10.0.17763.9020< 10.0.19044.7548< 10.0.19045.7548< 10.0.26100.8875< 10.0.26200.8875< 10.0.28000.2269< 10.0.28000.2525< 10.0.14393.9339CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify ReFS file system is in useOpen PowerShell and run 'Get-Volume | Select-Object DriveLetter, FileSystemLabel, FileSystem' to list all volumes and their file systems. Look for any volume with FileSystem equal to 'ReFS' or 'ReFSv1'Affected if Any volume on the system is formatted with ReFS and the Windows version falls within the affected ranges below
-
Determine Windows version and build numberRun 'winver' from the Run dialog or run 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt/PowerShell to obtain the exact OS version and build number (e.g., 10.0.14393.9339)Affected if The system is running a version lower than the corresponding threshold for its Windows release as listed in step 3
-
Compare version against affected ranges for Windows 10 1607 and Windows Server 2016If the OS version begins with 10.0.14393, verify the build number is less than 9339. Run 'reg query "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion" /v CurrentBuild' and '/v CurrentBuildNumber' to confirmAffected if Running Windows 10 1607 or Windows Server 2016 with build number below 10.0.14393.9339 AND ReFS is in use
-
Compare version against affected ranges for Windows 10 1809If the OS version begins with 10.0.17763, verify the build number is less than 9020Affected if Running Windows 10 1809 with build number below 10.0.17763.9020 AND ReFS is in use
-
Compare version against affected ranges for Windows 10 21h2 and 22h2If the OS version begins with 10.0.19044 or 10.0.19045, verify the build number is less than 7548Affected if Running Windows 10 21h2 (build < 10.0.19044.7548) or 22h2 (build < 10.0.19045.7548) AND ReFS is in use
-
Compare version against affected ranges for Windows 11Identify the Windows 11 release (24h2, 25h2, or 26h1) from the OS version. Check if version < 10.0.26100.8875 for 24h2, < 10.0.26200.8875 for 25h2, or < 10.0.28000.2269/< 10.0.28000.2525 for 26h1Affected if Running Windows 11 24h2, 25h2, or 26h1 with build below the respective threshold AND ReFS is in use
A system is affected if it uses ReFS on any volume AND runs a Windows version within the affected ranges listed (build numbers below the specified thresholds for the corresponding Windows release).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data10.0.14393.933910.0.17763.902010.0.19044.7548
Apply Microsoft security updates for ReFS when available; restrict local administrative access to reduce attack surface; monitor for suspicious file system activity.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-49793 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-49793 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data