Uncontrolled Resource ConsumptionWeakness · CWE-400

CVE-2026-49851

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 8 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Mistune is a Python Markdown parser with renderers and plugins. Prior to 3.3.0, Mistune is vulnerable to a CPU exhaustion DoS due to superlinear (approximately O(n²)) behavior in parse_link_text. When parsing Markdown containing many consecutive [ characters, parse_link_text repeatedly scans the input using a regex search inside a loop. Each iteration re-scans a large portion of the remaining string, resulting in quadratic-time behavior. An attacker-controlled Markdown input can therefore trigger excessive CPU usage with a very small payload. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.3.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Mistune Markdown parser prior to version 3.3.0 contains a CPU exhaustion vulnerability in parse_link_text caused by superlinear O(n²) complexity. When parsing Markdown with many consecutive [ characters, the function repeatedly scans the input using regex search inside a loop, re-scanning large portions of the remaining string on each iteration, enabling attackers to cause excessive CPU usage with small payloads.

MitigationUpgrade Mistune to version 3.3.0 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Mistune is installed
    Run 'pip show mistune' or check your project's requirements.txt/poetry.lock for the mistune package
    Affected if Mistune package is present in the environment
  2. Determine installed Mistune version
    Run 'pip show mistune' and look for the 'Version' field, or import mistune and print(mistune.__version__)
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 3.3.0 (e.g., 3.2.x, 3.1.x, 3.0.x, 2.x.x series)
  3. Check for markdown processing of untrusted input
    Search codebases for calls to mistune markdown functions such as mistune.markdown(), mistune.html(), or MD() with user-supplied input
    Affected if The application passes untrusted or externally-sourced Markdown text to Mistune's parsing functions
  4. Verify parse_link_text is reachable
    Confirm that parsed Markdown contains or could contain link syntax with consecutive [ characters (e.g., [[text or multiple adjacent brackets)
    Affected if The Markdown content being parsed includes sequences of '[' characters that would trigger the vulnerable code path in parse_link_text

If Mistune version is below 3.3.0 AND the application processes untrusted Markdown with link syntax containing consecutive brackets, the environment is affected by this CPU exhaustion vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Mistune to version 3.3.0 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

3.3.0

  1. Check your current mistune version by running `pip show mistune` or inspecting your requirements.txt/pipfile
  2. Upgrade mistune to version 3.3.0 or later using `pip install --upgrade mistune>=3.3.0` or `pip install mistune==3.3.0`
  3. Verify the upgrade was successful by running `pip show mistune` and confirming the version is 3.3.0 or higher
  4. If using a dependency lock file (e.g., requirements-lock.txt, Pipfile.lock), regenerate it to capture the new version
  5. Test that your markdown parsing functionality works correctly with the upgraded version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-49851 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-49851 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data