CVE-2026-49954
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDiscuz! X5.0 releases 20260320 through 20260610 contain a local file inclusion vulnerability that allows authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary code by importing a specially crafted plugin configuration containing path traversal sequences in the directory attribute. Attackers can trigger an exception during plugin installation to bypass sanitization routines, causing malicious paths to be stored unsanitized and subsequently passed to include(), which combined with file upload functionality escalates to arbitrary code execution in the context of the web server user.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDiscuz! X5.0 suffers from a local file inclusion vulnerability in its plugin configuration import functionality. An authenticated administrator can import a malicious plugin configuration containing path traversal sequences (e.g., ../../) in the directory attribute. When an exception occurs during plugin installation, the sanitization routine is bypassed, allowing the crafted path to be stored unsanitized. This path is later passed to PHP's include() function, and when combined with the file upload functionality, enables arbitrary code execution as the web server user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Discuz! X5.0 installationIdentify the Discuz! version by checking typical installation paths or admin panels for the version string 'X5.0' or 'Discuz! X Series version 5.0'Affected if The installed version is Discuz! X5.0 or falls within the X5.0 series range
-
Verify administrator accessCheck if you have administrator-level credentials or session access to the Discuz! admin control panelAffected if You can authenticate as an administrator user with privileges to access plugin management functions
-
Locate plugin import functionalitySearch for plugin configuration import features in the admin panel, typically under 'Plugin' or 'Extensions' management sections, or examine source code for 'import' or 'install' functions related to pluginsAffected if The plugin import feature exists and is accessible to authenticated administrators
-
Inspect plugin configuration handling codeExamine the plugin installation code path, specifically looking for include() or require() calls that use user-supplied directory attributes without strict validation, and check if exception handlers can bypass sanitization logicAffected if The code passes directory path parameters from imported plugin configurations directly to include() without comprehensive validation that survives exception conditions
-
Check file upload capabilityVerify whether file upload functionality is enabled in the plugin installation process or general settings, as this is required in combination with the LFI for remote code executionAffected if File uploads are permitted and can be combined with the include() vulnerability
You are affected if Discuz! X5.0 is installed, you have administrator access, and the plugin import feature passes unsanitized directory paths to PHP's include() function when exceptions occur during installation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict whitelist-based path validation that cannot be bypassed by exceptions, ensure sanitization always runs regardless of error conditions, and restrict include() calls to a predefined safe directory whitelist.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-49954 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-49954 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data