Connect M6e 5g FirmwareOperating system · Acer

CVE-2026-50212

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
70/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Weak validation logic within device dissociation API routines allows a remote entity to forcefully unbind unrelated user endpoints, causing severe denial of service.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The vulnerability exists in device dissociation API routines where weak validation logic fails to properly verify that the requesting user owns or has authorization over the target endpoint. A remote attacker can send dissociation requests for any user device, causing forceful unbinding and severe denial of service.

MitigationImplement robust authorization checks in all device dissociation API endpoints to verify the requester owns or has explicit permission to dissociate the target device before processing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Connect M6e 5g FirmwareOperating system
Affected:<= m6e_ai_1.00.000019

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device firmware version
    Access the device admin interface or check via SNMP/sysinfo endpoint to retrieve the current firmware version string (m6e_ai_1.XX.XXXXXX)
    Affected if Firmware version is m6e_ai_1.00.000019 or lower (any version <= m6e_ai_1.00.000019)
  2. Locate device dissociation API endpoints
    Review API documentation or perform network scanning to identify exposed endpoints related to device unbinding, unbind, disassociate, or endpoint removal functionality
    Affected if The device dissociation/unbind API endpoints are exposed and accessible on the network
  3. Verify API access controls on dissociation endpoints
    Send a test dissociation request to the identified API endpoint using an unauthorized or non-owning endpoint identifier and observe the server response
    Affected if The API accepts and processes dissociation requests without requiring proof of ownership or proper authorization for the target endpoint
  4. Check authentication requirements on unbind operations
    Inspect API request headers and parameters for authentication tokens, session cookies, or ownership claims; attempt an unbind request with invalid or missing credentials
    Affected if The dissociation API processes requests without validating that the requester owns or has permission to dissociate the target device
  5. Review logs for unauthorized disassociation events
    Examine device system logs, audit logs, or event logs for entries indicating device unbind operations that reference endpoint IDs not associated with the requesting user
    Affected if Logs show dissociation events occurring for endpoints the legitimate owner did not initiate

The device is affected if it is an Acer Connect M6e 5g running firmware version m6e_ai_1.00.000019 or lower AND the device dissociation API is network-accessible without proper ownership validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement robust authorization checks in all device dissociation API endpoints to verify the requester owns or has explicit permission to dissociate the target device before processing.

Fix this in Connect M6e 5g Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-50212 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-50212 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data