CVE-2026-50308
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInteger underflow (wrap or wraparound) in Windows NTFS allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
In the news
Third-party coverage- Microsoft July 2026 Patch Tuesday fixes massive 570 flaws, 3 zero-days
- Microsoft CVE Summary - Bleeping Computer
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInteger underflow vulnerability in Windows NTFS filesystem driver allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code due to improper integer arithmetic validation when processing certain filesystem operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9339< 10.0.17763.9020< 10.0.19044.7548< 10.0.19045.7548< 10.0.26100.8875< 10.0.26200.8875< 10.0.28000.2269< 10.0.28000.2525all versions= r2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Windows build numberRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS"' to obtain the full Windows build versionAffected if Build number falls below the threshold for your Windows version (see version-specific thresholds)
-
Check Windows version and buildRun 'reg query "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion" /v BuildLabEx' or 'ver' command to get exact version stringAffected if Version matches affected Windows 10 or Windows 11 releases AND build is lower than the specified threshold
-
Identify NTFS driver presenceRun 'driverquery /v | findstr NTFS' or check 'C:\Windows\System32\drivers\NTFS.sys' existenceAffected if NTFS.sys driver is present on the system (required for vulnerability)
-
Verify NTFS filesystem is in useRun 'fsutil fsinfo volumeinfo C:' to confirm NTFS filesystem is active on system drivesAffected if System drive uses NTFS filesystem (vulnerability applies to NTFS operations)
-
Confirm Windows Server 2012/R2 statusRun 'systeminfo' and check if OS is Windows Server 2012 or Server 2012 R2Affected if Operating system is Windows Server 2012 or Server 2012 R2 (all versions affected)
System is affected if it runs a vulnerable Windows version/build (below threshold) with NTFS filesystem and the NTFS driver present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.933910.0.17763.902010.0.19044.7548
Apply Microsoft security patches for Windows NTFS when released; prioritize patch deployment on affected endpoints and servers.
Windows 10 1607: build 10.0.14393.9339 | Windows 10 1809: build 10.0.17763.9020 | Windows 10 21h2: build 10.0.19044.7548 | Windows 10 22h2: build 10.0.19045.7548 | Windows 11 24h2: build 10.0.26100.8875 | Windows 11 25h2: build 10.0.26200.8875 | Windows 11 26h1: build 10.0.28000.2525 | Windows Serve
- Identify the current Windows version by running 'winver' or checking System Properties
- Determine the specific build number by running 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"'
- For Windows 10 1607 (build < 10.0.14393): Upgrade to build 10.0.14393.9339 or later via Windows Update or Media Creation Tool
- For Windows 10 1809 (build < 10.0.17763): Upgrade to build 10.0.17763.9020 or later
- For Windows 10 21h2 (build < 10.0.19044): Upgrade to build 10.0.19044.7548 or later
- For Windows 10 22h2 (build < 10.0.19045): Upgrade to build 10.0.19045.7548 or later
- For Windows 11 24h2 (build < 10.0.26100): Upgrade to build 10.0.26100.8875 or later
- For Windows 11 25h2 (build < 10.0.26200): Upgrade to build 10.0.26200.8875 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-50308 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-50308 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data