CVE-2026-50321
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows USB Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
In the news
Third-party coverage- Microsoft July 2026 Patch Tuesday fixes massive 570 flaws, 3 zero-days
- Microsoft CVE Summary - Bleeping Computer
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability exists in a Windows USB driver where improper synchronization of shared resources allows a local authorized attacker to exploit a time-of-check-to-time-of-use (TOCTOU) scenario and elevate privileges to higher authority levels.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9339< 10.0.17763.9020< 10.0.19044.7548< 10.0.19045.7548< 10.0.26100.8875< 10.0.26200.8875< 10.0.28000.2269< 10.0.28000.2525all versions= r2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows version against affected rangesRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to identify your Windows version and build numberAffected if Build number is less than the thresholds: 14393.9339 (1607), 17763.9020 (1809), 19044.7548 (21h2), 19045.7548 (22h2), 26100.8875 (24h2), 26200.8875 (25h2), 28000.2269/2525 (26h1), or Windows Server 2012/R2 (any version)
-
Identify USB driver file versionLocate the USB driver file in System32\drivers folder (commonly usbhub.sys, usbxhci.sys, or ucx010.sys depending on architecture) and check its file version via Properties > Details or 'driverquery /v | findstr usb'Affected if Driver file version is older than the patched version corresponding to your Windows build
-
Confirm USB functionality is in useCheck if USB driver services are running: 'sc query usbhub' and 'sc query xhci' (or applicable USB controller service) to see if USB stack is activeAffected if USB drivers/services are loaded and running on the system
System is affected if it runs a Windows version or Server 2012/R2 with build numbers below the patched thresholds AND has USB drivers loaded.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.933910.0.17763.902010.0.19044.7548
Apply the relevant Microsoft security patch or vendor-specific driver update to address the race condition. Validate that USB functionality remains operational after patch deployment.
Upgrade to the fixed build numbers: Windows 10 1607 (10.0.14393.9339+), Windows 10 1809 (10.0.17763.9020+), Windows 10 21h2 (10.0.19044.7548+), Windows 10 22h2 (10.0.19045.7548+), Windows 11 24h2 (10.0.26100.8875+), Windows 11 25h2 (10.0.26200.8875+), Windows 11 26h1 (10.0.28000.2525+), Windows Serv
- Open Windows Settings and navigate to Update & Security > Windows Update
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the latest cumulative update
- Verify the installed build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows release: Windows 10 1607: 10.0.14393.9339, Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.9020, Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.7548, Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.7548, Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.8875, Windows 11 25h2: 10.0.26200.8875, Windows 11 26h1: 10.0.28000.2525 or later
- For Windows Server 2012/R2, apply the applicable monthly security update from Microsoft Catalog (kb5002537 or subsequent updates)
- Restart the system after updates are installed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-50321 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-50321 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data