CVE-2026-50371
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows LUAFV allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
In the news
Third-party coverage- Microsoft July 2026 Patch Tuesday fixes massive 570 flaws, 3 zero-days
- Microsoft CVE Summary - Bleeping Computer
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability exists in Windows LUAFV (Legacy Unicode ANSI File Virtualization) where concurrent execution improperly synchronizes shared resources, allowing an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally to higher authority levels.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9339< 10.0.17763.9020< 10.0.19044.7548< 10.0.19045.7548< 10.0.26100.8875< 10.0.26200.8875< 10.0.28000.2525all versions= r2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows build versionRun 'winver' or execute 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' to obtain the exact build number, or check the registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\CurrentBuildAffected if The build number is lower than the fixed version for your specific Windows release (e.g., below 10.0.14393.9339 for 1607, below 10.0.17763.9020 for 1809, below 10.0.19044.7548 for 21h2, below 10.0.19045.7548 for 22h2, below 10.0.26100.8875 for 11 24h2, below 10.0.26200.8875 for 11 25h2, or below 10.
-
Confirm Windows 10 releaseRun 'winver' or check the registry at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion to identify the specific release (1607, 1809, 21h2, or 22h2)Affected if You are on Windows 10 1607, 1809, 21h2, or 22h2 and the build is below the corresponding threshold
-
Confirm Windows 11 or Server releaseRun 'winver' to identify if running Windows 11 24h2, 25h2, 26h1, or Windows Server 2012 R2Affected if You are on Windows 11 24h2, 25h2, 26h1 with build below threshold, or any Windows Server 2012 R2 version (all versions affected)
-
Verify LUAFV service presenceOpen Services console (services.msc) or run 'sc query luafv' to check if the LUAFV service exists and its current statusAffected if The LUAFV service is present on the system (this is the vulnerable component)
-
Confirm LUAFV driver loadedRun 'sc queryex type= driver' or check Device Manager for 'luafv.sys' under non-plug and play drivers to verify the driver is loadedAffected if The luafv.sys driver is loaded and running on the system
Your system is affected if it runs a Windows version listed in the affected products AND the current build number is below the fixed threshold, with LUAFV service/driver present on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.933910.0.17763.902010.0.19044.7548
Apply Microsoft security patches for LUAFV when available; implement least-privilege principles and restrict local admin access to reduce attack surface.
Windows 10 1607: build 10.0.14393.9339 | Windows 10 1809: build 10.0.17763.9020 | Windows 10 21h2: build 10.0.19044.7548 | Windows 10 22h2: build 10.0.19045.7548 | Windows 11 24h2: build 10.0.26100.8875 | Windows 11 25h2: build 10.0.26200.8875 | Windows 11 26h1: build 10.0.28000.2525 | Windows Serve
- Open Windows Settings and navigate to Update & Security > Windows Update
- Click 'Check for updates' to install the latest cumulative security update for your Windows version
- Alternatively, manually install the specific KB patch for your Windows version from Microsoft Update Catalog
- Restart the system after applying the update
- Verify the installed build version matches or exceeds the fixed build number for your Windows release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,760.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-50371 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-50371 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data