CVE-2026-50434
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedExposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Windows Push Notifications allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
In the news
Third-party coverage- Microsoft July 2026 Patch Tuesday fixes massive 570 flaws, 3 zero-days
- Microsoft CVE Summary - Bleeping Computer
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a local information disclosure vulnerability in Windows Push Notifications where an authorized attacker can access sensitive information through the notification system. The attack requires local access and the attacker must have some level of authorized access to the system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.19044.7548< 10.0.19045.7548< 10.0.26100.8875< 10.0.26200.8875< 10.0.28000.2269< 10.0.28000.2525< 10.0.20348.5386< 10.0.26100.33158CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows version and build numberRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to obtain the installed Windows version and build numberAffected if The build number is below 19044.7548 for Windows 10 21h2, below 19045.7548 for Windows 10 22h2, below 26100.8875 for Windows 11 24h2, below 26200.8875 for Windows 11 25h2, below 28000.2269 or 28000.2525 for Windows 11 26h1, below 20348.5386 for Windows Server 2022, or below 26100.33158 for Windows S
-
Verify Windows Push Notifications service existsRun 'Get-Service WpnUserService' in PowerShell or check Services.msc for 'Windows Push Notifications User Service'Affected if The Windows Push Notifications User Service is present on the system (default enabled component)
-
Confirm local access contextReview system access logs and user session data to determine if untrusted local users or processes have access to the systemAffected if Multiple users have local access or the system hosts untrusted local accounts
You are affected if your Windows build number falls below the fixed version for your specific Windows release and Windows Push Notifications User Service is enabled on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.19044.754810.0.19045.754810.0.20348.5386
Apply the relevant Microsoft security update for Windows Push Notifications when available. Ensure systems are patched through standard Windows Update processes.
Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.7548+ | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.7548+ | Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.8875+ | Windows 11 25h2: 10.0.26200.8875+ | Windows 11 26h1: 10.0.28000.2525+ | Windows Server 2022: 10.0.20348.5386+ | Windows Server 2025: 10.0.26100.33158+
- Identify the current Windows build version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- Determine which Windows version and build you are running from the affected versions list
- Apply the appropriate Windows Update: For Windows 10 21h2, update to build 10.0.19044.7548 or later
- For Windows 10 22h2, update to build 10.0.19045.7548 or later
- For Windows 11 24h2, update to build 10.0.26100.8875 or later
- For Windows 11 25h2, update to build 10.0.26200.8875 or later
- For Windows 11 26h1, update to build 10.0.28000.2525 or later
- For Windows Server 2022, update to build 10.0.20348.5386 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-50434 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-50434 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data