Improper Privilege ManagementWeakness · CWE-269

CVE-2026-50545

CRITICAL · 9.9 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-10
Patch available
A vendor patch is available. No clean upgrade release — apply the published patch.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Fission is an open-source, Kubernetes-native serverless framework that simplifies the deployment of functions and applications on Kubernetes. Prior to version 1.24.0, the Environment.spec.runtime.podSpec / spec.builder.podSpec passthrough lacked validation, and MergePodSpec propagated dangerous fields into the generated pods. This issue has been patched in version 1.24.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In Fission versions prior to 1.24.0, the Environment.spec.runtime.podSpec and spec.builder.podSpec fields were passed through to generated pods without validation. The MergePodSpec function propagated dangerous fields (such as hostPath mounts, privileged mode, additional capabilities, etc.) into the pod specs, allowing attackers to escape container isolation and gain host access.

MitigationUpgrade Fission to version 1.24.0 or later to receive the patched code that validates and sanitizes podSpec fields before merging them into generated pods.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Fission version
    Run `helm list -n fission` or `fission version` (or check the fission controller pod image tag) to determine the installed version
    Affected if Version is prior to 1.24.0
  2. List all Environment resources with podSpec definitions
    Run `kubectl get environments -A -o jsonpath='{range .items[*]}{.metadata.namespace}{.metadata.name}{.spec.runtime}{.spec.builder}{end}'` or examine each Environment's YAML for runtime.podSpec or builder.podSpec fields
    Affected if Any Environment resource contains runtime.podSpec or builder.podSpec configuration
  3. Inspect podSpec for dangerous fields
    For each Environment with podSpec, examine the podSpec content for dangerous configurations: hostPath type volumes (hostPath in volumes), privileged: true, or capabilities.add entries
    Affected if The podSpec contains hostPath volume mounts, privileged mode, or additional capabilities that could escape container isolation
  4. Verify if affected environments are actively used
    Check if functions are using the affected environments by running `kubectl get functions -A` and cross-referencing with environment names
    Affected if Functions are deployed using environments with dangerous podSpec configurations in a Fission version prior to 1.24.0

You are affected if Fission version is prior to 1.24.0 AND any Environment resource with runtime.podSpec or builder.podSpec contains dangerous fields such as hostPath mounts, privileged mode, or additional capabilities.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Patch available Apply the vendor patch
Vendor patch github.com →
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Fission to version 1.24.0 or later to receive the patched code that validates and sanitizes podSpec fields before merging them into generated pods.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.24.0

  1. Identify current Fission version using 'fission version' or checking the installed Helm chart
  2. Review the Fission 1.24.0 release notes for any migration requirements or breaking changes
  3. Upgrade Fission to version 1.24.0 or later using the standard upgrade method (Helm upgrade for Helm-based installations)
  4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Fission controller pods are running
  5. Confirm that Environment podSpec and builder podSpec fields are now properly validated
Caveat Review Fission 1.24.0 release notes for any breaking changes or required migration steps before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $2,960
Get the patch applied

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,736.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-50545 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-50545 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data