Incorrect Privilege AssignmentWeakness · CWE-266

CVE-2026-50562

CRITICAL · 9.3 CVSS v4.0 Published 2026-07-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 5 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
FastGPT is a knowledge-based AI application platform. At commit 22ebfacbb43311e9b73294040ae0eb87390c6bba and earlier, artifacts built from untrusted pull request code in .github/workflows/preview-docs-build.yml and .github/workflows/preview-fastgpt-build.yml can be downloaded by privileged workflow_run jobs in .github/workflows/preview-docs-push.yml and .github/workflows/preview-fastgpt-push.yml, allowing attacker-controlled Docker images from the document/ tree or FastGPT build context to be pushed to GHCR and, for documentation previews, deployed with secrets.KUBE_CONFIG_CN.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

FastGPT's GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline allows untrusted pull request artifacts from .github/workflows/preview-docs-build.yml and .github/workflows/preview-fastgpt-build.yml to be downloaded by privileged workflow_run jobs, enabling attackers to inject malicious Docker images that get pushed to GHCR and, for documentation previews, deployed with Kubernetes credentials (KUBE_CONFIG_CN).

MitigationRemove or secure the workflow_run trigger that downloads untrusted PR artifacts, implement artifact verification/signing, and avoid deploying PR preview images with production credentials like KUBE_CONFIG_CN.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify vulnerable workflow files
    Check if .github/workflows/preview-docs-build.yml and/or .github/workflows/preview-fastgpt-build.yml exist in the repository root
    Affected if Either or both of these workflow files exist in the repository
  2. Verify workflow_run trigger usage
    Inspect both workflow files for 'workflow_run' trigger and examine whether they download artifacts using actions like 'download-artifact' from the triggered run
    Affected if The workflow uses workflow_run trigger AND downloads artifacts from the untrusted PR workflow run
  3. Check for Kubernetes credential usage
    Search both workflow files for references to KUBE_CONFIG_CN, KUBECONFIG, or kubernetes-related secrets/environment variables
    Affected if KUBE_CONFIG_CN or similar Kubernetes credentials are used in these workflows
  4. Confirm GHCR image push configuration
    Examine the workflows for 'docker build-push-action' or similar steps that push container images to GHCR (ghcr.io)
    Affected if The workflows build and push Docker images to GHCR from PR-triggered artifact outputs
  5. Assess artifact trust boundary
    Review whether the workflows implement any artifact verification, checksum validation, or signing mechanism before using downloaded artifacts
    Affected if No artifact verification or trust validation is implemented before using downloaded PR artifacts

A user is affected if their FastGPT repository contains the preview-docs-build.yml or preview-fastgpt-build.yml workflows that use workflow_run to download untrusted PR artifacts and deploy them with KUBE_CONFIG_CN or push them to GHCR without verification.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Remove or secure the workflow_run trigger that downloads untrusted PR artifacts, implement artifact verification/signing, and avoid deploying PR preview images with production credentials like KUBE_CONFIG_CN.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-50562 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-50562 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data