CVE-2026-50643
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited8cc is vulnerable to an Out‑of‑Bounds Read due to improper handling of #line directives and GNU linemarkers. The compiler accepts attacker-controlled filename and line number metadata and later uses it without validation when accessing source line arrays. By supplying invalid or oversized line numbers, an attacker can trigger out-of-bounds memory access and a crash. Maintainer of this project was notified early about this vulnerability, but didn't respond with the details of vulnerability or vulnerable version range. Version corresponding to the commit b480958 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable, other versions were not tested but might also be vulnerable.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe 8cc compiler has an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in its handling of #line directives and GNU linemarkers. The compiler accepts attacker-controlled filename and line number metadata without validation and later uses this metadata to index into source line arrays. By supplying invalid or oversized line numbers, an attacker can trigger out-of-bounds memory access and cause a denial of service via crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if 8cc compiler is installedRun 'which 8cc' or 'command -v 8cc' to locate the 8cc binary on the systemAffected if 8cc binary exists on the system - the compiler is present and could be used to compile untrusted source code
-
Determine the installed version of 8ccRun '8cc --version' or '8cc -v' to retrieve the version string. If version output is unavailable, check for package manager installation details via 'dpkg -l 8cc' or 'rpm -qi 8cc'Affected if The installed version cannot be confirmed as a patched version - without a reported fixed version, any installed 8cc may be affected
-
Inspect source code processing of #line directivesIf source code is available, examine the parser handling of #line directives and GNU linemarkers (lines starting with # followed by digits). Look for code that extracts line numbers from these directives without bounds validation before array accessAffected if The compiler processes #line directives and uses the extracted line numbers to index into source line arrays without validating that the line numbers fall within the actual source file bounds
-
Test for vulnerable behavior with crafted inputCreate a test source file containing a #line directive with an extremely large line number (e.g., '#line 999999999') followed by code that triggers source line array access, then compile it with 8cc and observe for crashes or abnormal behaviorAffected if The compiler crashes, segfaults, or exhibits out-of-bounds memory access when processing #line directives with invalid line numbers - this confirms the vulnerability is present and triggerable
A system is affected if 8cc is installed and processes #line directives or GNU linemarkers without validating that attacker-supplied line numbers are within the actual source file bounds before using them to index source line arrays.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement bounds checking on line number metadata from #line directives and GNU linemarkers before accessing source line arrays. Validate that line numbers fall within the actual source file bounds and reject or sanitize invalid metadata.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-50643 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-50643 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data