CVE-2026-50882
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in the /api/v0/pastes endpoint of anna-is-cute paste v0.1.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted POST request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA Denial of Service vulnerability exists in the /api/v0/pastes endpoint of anna-is-cute paste v0.1.1. Attackers can cause service disruption by sending a crafted POST request to this API endpoint.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed version of anna-is-cute pasteCheck the application version by reviewing package.json, version file, or running 'anna-is-cute --version' or similar version command if availableAffected if Version is v0.1.1 exactly or falls within the v0.1.1 release line
-
Verify /api/v0/pastes endpoint is accessibleAttempt to reach the endpoint via curl http://<host>:<port>/api/v0/pastes or check service configuration for exposed API routesAffected if Endpoint returns a valid HTTP response (200, 400, 405, etc.) indicating it is exposed and functional
-
Confirm POST method is enabled on the endpointSend a POST request to /api/v0/pastes (curl -X POST http://<host>:<port>/api/v0/pastes) and verify the method is allowedAffected if POST requests are accepted and processed by the endpoint
-
Check if service is running without rate limiting or input validationReview service configuration files or test the endpoint behavior with varied input to infer whether rate limiting or input validation is active on /api/v0/pastesAffected if No rate limiting or input validation is configured for this endpoint
If running anna-is-cute paste v0.1.1 with the /api/v0/pastes endpoint exposed and accepting POST requests, the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement input validation and request rate limiting on the /api/v0/pastes endpoint; also apply any available vendor patch for anna-is-cute paste v0.1.1.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-50882 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-50882 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data