CVE-2026-50883
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn HTML injection vulnerability in the /src/highlight.rs component of matze wastebin v3.4.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary scripts via a crafted payload.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the highlight.rs component of pastebin application wastebin v3.4.1 allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript via unsanitized HTML in crafted payloads, potentially leading to session hijacking or malicious actions against other users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if wastebin is deployedCheck for running processes or installed packages named 'wastebin', or look for the wastebin binary/web service in common locations (/usr/bin/wastebin, /opt/wastebin, or running as a container)Affected if wastebin pastebin application is present in the environment
-
Determine installed versionRun 'wastebin --version' or check the version displayed on the web interface, or inspect the binary/package version metadataAffected if version is 3.4.1 or falls within the v3.4.x range prior to any available patch
-
Verify highlight.rs component is accessibleAttempt to access the highlight functionality - typically at an endpoint like /highlight, /code/highlight, or similar URL path that invokes the highlight.rs component for syntax highlightingAffected if the highlight endpoint is reachable without authentication or accessible to users
-
Test for XSS in highlight componentSubmit a test payload containing unsanitized HTML (e.g., <script>alert('XSS')</script>) via the highlight feature and observe if the script executes in the responseAffected if the submitted HTML is reflected unmodified in the output and the script executes in a browser context
User is affected if wastebin version 3.4.1 is running and the highlight.rs component is accessible, allowing injected HTML/JS to execute without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper HTML sanitization and output encoding in the highlight.rs component to neutralize script execution, and upgrade to any patched version if available.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-50883 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-50883 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data