CVE-2026-50885
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect access control in the share-based read endpoints of Sismics Docs (Teedy) v1.11 allow unauthorized attackers to access sensitive endpoints via a crafted request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSismics Docs (Teedy) v1.11 contains incorrect access control in share-based read endpoints. The vulnerability allows unauthorized attackers to bypass authorization checks and access sensitive endpoints through crafted requests, potentially exposing confidential documents or system data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Teedy versionCheck the application version through the web UI (typically in About/Help section) or by inspecting the deployed WAR/JAR file name or manifest. Compare against v1.11.Affected if Installed version is exactly v1.11 or falls within the v1.11 release line (e.g., v1.11.x).
-
Verify share feature is in useCheck if any document sharing functionality has been enabled or if shared links exist in the system. Look for share-related configurations in the application's settings database or configuration files.Affected if The share feature is enabled and share links have been created for documents.
-
Test share-based read endpoint authorizationUse a web proxy or curl to send a crafted GET request to a known share-based endpoint (e.g., /api/share/{shareId}/document) with a valid share token but without proper session authentication. Compare the response against expected behavior.Affected if The endpoint returns document content or sensitive data without verifying user permissions beyond the share token.
-
Inspect share token usage logsReview application logs for share-based endpoint access patterns. Look for requests to share endpoints that lack associated user session tokens or show unauthenticated access.Affected if Logs show share token-based requests accessing documents without corresponding authorization checks in the request flow.
The environment is affected if running Teedy v1.11 with the share feature enabled and share-based read endpoints permit unauthorized access to documents without proper permission validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization validation on all share-based read endpoints to verify the requester's permissions before returning any data. Restrict share token usage to only authorized recipients.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-50885 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-50885 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data