CVE-2026-50888
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the custom scraper subsystem component of Benjamin Jonard Koillection v1.8.0 allows attackers to scan internal resources via supplying a crafted URL.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the custom scraper subsystem of Koillection v1.8.0. Attackers with valid credentials can supply crafted URLs to the scraper component, enabling them to make the server perform requests to internal resources, potentially accessing internal services, metadata endpoints, or internal network infrastructure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Koellection versionLocate the version file or check the admin dashboard for the current Koellection installation version numberAffected if Version is 1.8.0 exactly or falls within the v1.8.0 release line (e.g., 1.8.0.x)
-
Verify custom scraper subsystem is accessibleCheck if the custom scraper feature is enabled in the application settings or accessible via the web interface for authenticated usersAffected if Custom scraper functionality is available to authenticated users in the affected version
-
Inspect custom scraper configurationReview the scraper configuration files or database records for any user-defined scrapers that accept URL inputsAffected if Custom scrapers exist that accept arbitrary URLs from authenticated users
-
Examine application logs for internal network requestsSearch web server or application logs for requests to internal IP ranges (127.0.0.1, 10.x.x.x, 192.168.x.x) originating from the scraper subsystem
You are affected if running Koellection v1.8.0 and the custom scraper subsystem is accessible to authenticated users, as the combination enables authenticated SSRF attacks on internal network resources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict allowlist validation for URLs processed by the custom scraper, restrict server-side request capabilities to trusted domains only, and apply network segmentation to limit the impact of SSRF exploitation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-50888 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-50888 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data