CVE-2026-50891
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect access control in the /admin/api/config component of Filestash v0.4.0 allows attackers to escalate privileges via sending a crafted request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIncorrect access control in the /admin/api/config endpoint of Filestash v0.4.0 allows unauthenticated or low-privilege attackers to send crafted requests that bypass authorization checks, enabling privilege escalation to admin-level access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Filestash versionCheck the running Filestash instance version by reviewing the Docker container tag, the application startup logs, or querying the /api/version endpoint if availableAffected if The installed version is 0.4.0 or falls within the v0.4.x release line
-
Verify /admin/api/config endpoint exposureAttempt to access the /admin/api/config endpoint from the Filestash server using curl or a similar HTTP client (e.g., curl -s http://localhost:8334/admin/api/config)Affected if The endpoint returns any HTTP response without requiring authentication credentials
-
Confirm authentication enforcementSend a request to /admin/api/config without including session cookies, API keys, or Authorization headers and inspect the HTTP response codeAffected if The server returns a 200 OK or exposes configuration data instead of returning 401 Unauthorized or 403 Forbidden
-
Check authorization controlsLog in with a low-privilege or non-admin user account and attempt a POST request to /admin/api/config with a benign payload to test if privilege escalation is possibleAffected if The low-privilege user can successfully modify configuration settings or access admin-level data through this endpoint
You are affected if running Filestash v0.4.0 and the /admin/api/config endpoint is accessible without valid admin authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Filestash to the latest patched version. Until then, restrict network access to admin API endpoints and implement additional authentication layers such as API keys or VPN controls.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-50891 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-50891 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data