CVE-2026-51537
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedEIPStackGroup OpENer 2.3.0 (commit 76b95cf) has an out-of-bounds read issue in Connection Manager handling of ForwardOpen requests when processing short malformed packets. An attacker can send a valid ENIP outer frame carrying a malformed CIP ForwardOpen/LargeForwardOpen request, causing the parser to continue reading fields even when request data is insufficient. This issue is remotely triggerable via network traffic and does not require authentication.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOpENer 2.3.0 contains an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the Connection Manager's ForwardOpen/LargeForwardOpen request handling. When processing malformed CIP requests embedded in ENIP frames with insufficient data, the parser continues reading fields beyond the packet boundaries, causing memory corruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OpENer installation and versionLocate the OpENer application or library files on the system and determine the installed version (typically found in application metadata, binary properties, or version information files). Compare the found version against the affected version 2.3.0.Affected if OpENer version 2.3.0 is installed and running.
-
Verify Connection Manager is activeCheck if the OpENer Connection Manager component is enabled and processing CIP requests. This can be confirmed by reviewing the application configuration or runtime status to confirm CIP ForwardOpen and LargeForwardOpen request handling is active.Affected if Connection Manager is enabled and configured to process CIP ForwardOpen/LargeForwardOpen requests.
-
Confirm CIP communication ports are openInspect network listener configuration to determine if CIP ports (default 44818 for EtherNet/IP) are open and accepting connections. Use network scanning or port inspection tools to identify listening services.Affected if CIP ports are open and accessible, allowing external network packets to reach the OpENer service.
-
Check for unauthenticated network accessEvaluate network accessibility of the CIP service. Determine if the service is exposed to untrusted networks or if proper network segmentation restricts access to authorized endpoints only.Affected if The CIP service is reachable from untrusted network segments without authentication requirements.
You are affected if OpENer version 2.3.0 is running with Connection Manager processing CIP ForwardOpen/LargeForwardOpen requests and the CIP port is network-accessible to potential attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement rigorous input validation: validate total packet length against expected request size before parsing any fields, reject packets with insufficient data, and add explicit bounds checks before each field read operation in the CIP request parser.
Latest stable release of EIPStackGroup OpENer (verify releases >2.3.0 on github.com/EIPStackGroup/OpENer)
- 1. Identify the current OpENer version in use by checking the source code or build artifacts
- 2. Navigate to the official EIPStackGroup OpENer GitHub repository at github.com/EIPStackGroup/OpENer
- 3. Review the release page to identify the latest stable release version that includes fixes after commit 76b95cf
- 4. Download or clone the latest stable release version
- 5. Replace the vulnerable OpENer binaries or source code with the new version
- 6. Rebuild and redeploy the application following the project's build instructions
- 7. Verify the deployment and test that legitimate CIP ForwardOpen operations still function correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-51537 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-51537 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data