CVE-2026-51603
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the RTSP service of Tenda CP3 V3.0 (firmware V31.1.9.91) allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service via a crafted second SETUP request. After completing the OPTIONS, DESCRIBE, and a legitimate first SETUP request to obtain a valid session ID, the RTSP service's second-stage URL routing parser fails to validate the length of the URL field in the subsequent SETUP request. By supplying a URL consisting of exactly four consecutive repetitions of a valid RTSP URL, an attacker can bypass first-stage format validation and trigger a stack buffer overflow, causing an immediate crash of the RTSP service process and rendering the device inaccessible to all clients on the local network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in Tenda CP3 V3.0 RTSP service's second-stage URL routing parser. After completing valid RTSP handshake (OPTIONS, DESCRIBE, first SETUP) to obtain a session ID, sending a second SETUP request with a URL containing exactly four consecutive repetitions of a valid RTSP URL bypasses first-stage validation and overflows a stack buffer, causing immediate service crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Tenda CP3 firmware versionLog into the device web UI and look under 'Device Info' for the firmware version, or run 'cat /proc/version' via telnet/SSH if you have console access.Affected if The firmware version is 3.0 (the version listed as affected).
-
Verify RTSP service is enabled and listeningRun 'netstat -tlnp | grep 554' or use nmap to scan port 554 on the device IP.Affected if RTSP service is listening on port 554 (or the default RTSP port).
-
Confirm RTSP handshake completes and yields a session IDSend an RTSP OPTIONS request, followed by DESCRIBE and a first SETUP using a standard RTSP client (e.g., VLC or a script). Verify a session ID is returned.Affected if The device returns a valid RTSP session ID after the initial handshake, indicating the RTSP service is active.
-
Inspect RTSP traffic for the malicious second SETUP patternCapture network traffic on the device or at the switch using tcpdump or Wireshark. Look for a second SETUP request that contains a URL with exactly four consecutive repetitions of a valid RTSP URL (e.g., 'rtsp://example.com/').Affected if Such a packet is observed in the capture.
-
Check for RTSP service crash logsReview the device's system logs (e.g., /var/log/messages, syslog, or the web UI's 'Log' page) for entries indicating the RTSP process has crashed or restarted after the above packet was sent.Affected if The logs show a crash or unexpected restart of the RTSP service correlated with the pattern.
If the device runs Tenda CP3 firmware V3.0, has RTSP listening on port 554, and the service crashes after receiving a second SETUP request with a URL containing exactly four consecutive repetitions, the environment is affected by CVE-2026-51603.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply network segmentation to isolate affected device; disable RTSP service if unnecessary; contact Tenda for firmware update; implement IDS/IPS rules to detect RTSP anomaly patterns.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-51603 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-51603 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data