Path TraversalWeakness · CWE-22

CVE-2026-5166

CRITICAL · 9.6 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in TUBITAK BILGEM Software Technologies Research Institute Pardus Software Center allows Path Traversal. This issue affects Pardus Software Center: before 0.6.4.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A path traversal vulnerability in the Pardus Software Center allows attackers to escape the intended directory restrictions and access arbitrary files on the system by manipulating file path inputs (e.g., using '../' sequences). The 9.6 CVSS score indicates this is likely remotely exploitable without authentication, potentially allowing complete system compromise through the software center's package management operations.

MitigationUpgrade Pardus Software Center to version 0.6.4 or later. Until upgrade is possible, restrict access to the software center and monitor for suspicious file access patterns.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Pardus Software Center is installed
    Run command: dpkg -l | grep pardus-software-center or rpm -qa | grep pardus-software-center depending on package manager
    Affected if Package is not installed means not affected
  2. Determine installed version
    Run: dpkg -s pardus-software-center 2>/dev/null | grep Version or rpm -qi pardus-software-center | grep Version
    Affected if Version is below 0.6.4 (e.g., 0.6.3, 0.6.2, etc.)
  3. Confirm software center is enabled and accessible
    Check if the pardus-software-center service or GUI application is available to users: which pardus-software-center or ls /usr/bin/pardus-software-center
    Affected if Software center is installed and accessible to users
  4. Check for recent file access via software center
    Review system logs for package installation or file operations using the software center, looking for patterns with '../' sequences in paths: grep -r '\.\./' /var/log/* 2>/dev/null | grep -i software
    Affected if Logs show path traversal attempts or unusual file access through the software center

User is affected if Pardus Software Center is installed with a version prior to 0.6.4 and is accessible for use, as the path traversal flaw allows escaping directory restrictions through manipulated file path inputs.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Pardus Software Center to version 0.6.4 or later. Until upgrade is possible, restrict access to the software center and monitor for suspicious file access patterns.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

0.6.4

  1. 1. Backup the current Pardus Software Center configuration and any custom settings
  2. 2. Update the system package repository metadata
  3. 3. Upgrade Pardus Software Center to version 0.6.4 or later using the system package manager (e.g., sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade or equivalent Pardus package manager)
  4. 4. Verify the installed version is 0.6.4 or higher using the package manager or application info
  5. 5. Test the Software Center functionality to ensure the upgrade did not introduce regressions

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5166 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5166 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data