InjectionWeakness · CWE-74

CVE-2026-5206

MEDIUM · 6.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-31
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A security vulnerability has been detected in code-projects Simple Gym Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Payment Handler. The manipulation of the argument Payment_id/Amount/customer_id/payment_type/customer_name leads to sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in Simple Gym Management System 1.0's Payment Handler component allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via multiple parameters (Payment_id, Amount, customer_id, payment_type, customer_name). The lack of parameterized queries or input sanitization on these payment-related fields enables attackers to manipulate database queries.

MitigationReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements for all Payment Handler parameters, implement input validation, and apply the principle of least privilege to database accounts. Consider deploying a WAF as an additional layer of defense.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Simple Gym Management System installation
    Check your web server for files associated with Simple Gym Management System, typically in the web root directory. Look for files like login.php, index.php, or a 'gym' folder. Check for version identifiers in source code comments, README files, or meta tags in the application.
    Affected if The application installed is Simple Gym Management System version 1.0 or earlier without patches applied.
  2. Locate the Payment Handler component
    Search the application source code for files related to payment processing. Look for keywords such as 'payment', 'Payment Handler', 'payment_process', or similar in PHP files within the application directory structure.
    Affected if A Payment Handler component exists and processes payment-related user input.
  3. Identify vulnerable parameter usage
    Examine the Payment Handler code for direct usage of parameters Payment_id, Amount, customer_id, payment_type, and customer_name in SQL queries without visible sanitization or prepared statement usage. Search for patterns like $_POST or $_GET directly concatenated into SQL strings.
    Affected if Any of these parameters are used in SQL queries without parameterized binding or visible input sanitization functions.
  4. Check database query implementation
    Review the database interaction code in payment-related files. Look for usage of mysqli_query, mysql_query, PDO::query, or similar database functions where user-supplied values are inserted directly into the query string.
    Affected if SQL queries are constructed by concatenating user-supplied input from the payment parameters rather than using prepared statements or parameterized queries.

If Simple Gym Management System 1.0 is running with an exposed Payment Handler component that accepts the listed parameters and processes them via direct string concatenation into SQL queries, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements for all Payment Handler parameters, implement input validation, and apply the principle of least privilege to database accounts. Consider deploying a WAF as an additional layer of defense.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5206 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5206 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data