CVE-2026-5230
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Access Control, Missing Authorization vulnerability in MIA Technology Inc. Pizzy Library allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Pizzy Library: from 1.0.0.26250 before 1.3.9.26250.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Pizzy Library from MIA Technology Inc. contains an improper access control vulnerability where missing authorization checks allow attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. This enables unauthorized access to protected functionality or resources within applications using the library.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Pizzy Library in your environmentSearch your application dependencies, build artifacts, or installed packages for files or modules named 'pizzy' or 'Pizzy', and note the directory path where it is found.Affected if Pizzy Library is present in your application dependencies or runtime environment.
-
Determine the installed Pizzy Library versionCheck the library's version metadata by inspecting the package.json, .dll, .jar, or version file located in the Pizzy Library path, or run a package manager query such as 'pip show pizzy', 'npm list pizzy', or 'dotnet list package' if applicable.Affected if The installed version is lower than 1.3.9.26250.
-
Identify access control configuration for PizzyLocate configuration files, XML files, JSON settings, or environment variables that define security levels, authorization rules, or access control policies for the Pizzy Library. Common locations include config/ directory, appsettings.json, web.config, or custom config files referenced in initialization code.Affected if Access control security levels are set to a weak, default, or permissive configuration that lacks explicit authorization enforcement.
-
Verify if authorization checks are enforced on protected endpoints or functionsReview application code or API routes that call Pizzy Library functionality to confirm whether authorization logic (such as role checks, permission validation, or authentication enforcement) is explicitly implemented before invoking protected methods.Affected if Protected functionality can be accessed without proper authorization validation or with security level set to allow unrestricted access.
You are affected if Pizzy Library version 1.3.9.26250 or higher is not in use, AND the access control security levels are configured with weak or missing authorization checks that permit unauthorized access to protected functionality.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Pizzy Library to version 1.3.9.26250 or later to obtain the patched version with proper authorization controls. Review access control configurations in applications using the library to ensure security levels are correctly set.
1.3.9.26250 or later
- 1. Identify all deployments of Pizzy Library in your environment
- 2. Check the current version of Pizzy Library (look for version 1.0.0.26250 through versions before 1.3.9.26250)
- 3. Obtain the fixed version 1.3.9.26250 or later from the vendor (MIA Technology Inc.)
- 4. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- 5. Deploy the upgraded Pizzy Library version 1.3.9.26250 or later to production
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,840.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5230 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5230 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data