CVE-2026-52779
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.3.3 and 17.4.1, a cross-project IDOR / authorization context confusion in the Calendar and Team Planner modules allows a user with management permissions in one project to delete public Calendar or Team Planner Queries from another project where they do not have the corresponding management permissions. Both modules authorize the request against the project identified by :project_id in the URL, but the actual Query object is loaded later by :id from Query.visible(current_user) without verifying that the loaded Query belongs to the authorized project. As a result, an attacker can use permissions from Project A to delete shared/public Calendar or Team Planner views from Project B, causing integrity impact and limited availability impact for users relying on those shared views. This vulnerability is fixed in 17.3.3 and 17.4.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference) vulnerability in OpenProject's Calendar and Team Planner modules where the authorization check uses the project ID from the URL, but the actual Query object is loaded by a separate ID without verifying it belongs to that project. A user with management permissions in one project can delete public/shared Calendar or Team Planner queries from another project where they lack permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OpenProject versionAccess the OpenProject administration panel (typically at /admin) or check the installation's Gemfile.lock for the openproject-core version, or run 'openproject run rails runner "puts OpenProject::VERSION"' from the installation directoryAffected if The installed version is earlier than 17.3.3 or 17.4.1 (any 17.x version before these patch releases)
-
Verify Calendar module is enabledNavigate to Administration > Modules (or /admin/modules) and check if the Calendar module is listed as active for any project, or inspect the enabled_modules column in the projects database tableAffected if Calendar module is enabled on any project where users have view_shared_queries or manage_public_queries permissions across different projects
-
Verify Team Planner module is enabledNavigate to Administration > Modules and check if the Team Planner module is active, or query the enabled_modules setting for projectsAffected if Team Planner module is enabled on any project with cross-project query sharing permissions
-
Check for cross-project query sharing configurationInspect the roles and permissions at Administration > Users and Roles. Look for users with the 'Manage public queries' or 'View shared queries' permission in one project who also have access to a different project where they lack full permissionsAffected if A user has management permissions (delete_queries) in one project AND has access to shared/public queries from a different project where they lack the manage_public_queries permission
-
Test vulnerable query deletion behaviorAs a user with query management in Project A, attempt to delete a shared/public query from Project B using the URL pattern /projects/A/queries/{query_id}/destroy where query_id belongs to Project B's Calendar or Team PlannerAffected if The deletion succeeds despite the user lacking authorization over Project B's queries (confirms the IDOR is exploitable)
You are affected if running any OpenProject version below 17.3.3 or 17.4.1 with Calendar or Team Planner modules enabled, especially in multi-project environments where query sharing permissions exist across projects with different authorization levels.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to OpenProject version 17.3.3 or 17.4.1 which contains the patch for this authorization bypass vulnerability.
OpenProject 17.3.3 or 17.4.1
- 1. Identify the currently installed OpenProject version by checking the application's about page or package manager.
- 2. If running a version prior to 17.3.3 or 17.4.1, plan for an upgrade to one of these fixed versions.
- 3. Review the OpenProject upgrade documentation for your specific installation method (e.g., Docker, package, source).
- 4. Create a backup of the OpenProject database and configuration files before proceeding.
- 5. Perform the upgrade following the official upgrade path for your installation method.
- 6. After upgrade, verify the Calendar and Team Planner modules function correctly with proper authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-52779 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-52779 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data