CVE-2026-5327
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in efforthye fast-filesystem-mcp up to 3.5.1. The affected element is the function handleGetDiskUsage of the file src/index.ts. Performing a manipulation results in command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe handleGetDiskUsage function in src/index.ts of the efforthye fast-filesystem-mcp package (versions up to 3.5.1) is vulnerable to command injection. Attackers can manipulate input to the function to execute arbitrary system commands remotely. This affects a filesystem utility used for disk usage monitoring.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if fast-filesystem-mcp package is installedRun 'npm list fast-filesystem-mcp' or check your package.json dependencies for 'efforthye/fast-filesystem-mcp' or 'fast-filesystem-mcp'Affected if The package is listed in dependencies
-
Verify the installed versionRun 'npm list fast-filesystem-mcp' to see the installed version, or check the version field in node_modules/fast-filesystem-mcp/package.jsonAffected if Version is 3.5.1 or lower
-
Inspect the source code for handleGetDiskUsage usageSearch for 'handleGetDiskUsage' in your codebase or in node_modules/fast-filesystem-mcp/src/index.ts to confirm the vulnerable function exists in your deploymentAffected if The function is present in the installed package version
-
Determine if the function is exposed to network or API callersReview your application code to see if handleGetDiskUsage is bound to any API endpoint, RPC handler, or other network-accessible interfaceAffected if The function is exposed via an API, endpoint, or any external interface
-
Check if untrusted input reaches the functionReview the code path from external input (request parameters, user-provided paths, query arguments) to the handleGetDiskUsage call to see if input is passed without sanitizationAffected if User-controlled or external input can reach handleGetDiskUsage without validation
You are affected if fast-filesystem-mcp version 3.5.1 or lower is installed AND the handleGetDiskUsage function is exposed to untrusted input that could contain shell metacharacters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUntil an official patch is released, ensure the handleGetDiskUsage function is not exposed to untrusted input, and implement strict input validation/sanitization to prevent shell metacharacter injection. Consider restricting network access to any APIs exposing this functionality.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5327 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5327 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data