Path TraversalWeakness · CWE-22

CVE-2026-5344

MEDIUM · 6.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A security vulnerability has been detected in Textpattern up to 4.9.1. Affected by this vulnerability is the function mt_uploadImage of the file rpc/TXP_RPCServer.php of the component XML-RPC Handler. The manipulation of the argument file.name leads to path traversal. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor confirmed the issue and will provide a fix in the upcoming release.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Path traversal vulnerability in Textpattern CMS XML-RPC handler where the mt_uploadImage function fails to sanitize the file.name parameter, allowing attackers to manipulate file paths and write files outside the intended upload directory.

MitigationDisable the XML-RPC handler if unused; implement WAF rules to block path traversal patterns in upload parameters until the vendor patch is released.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Textpattern installation and version
    Locate the Textpattern installation directory and check the version file (typically version.php or composer.json in the root directory). Run: find /var/www -name 'version.php' -path '*/textpattern/*' 2>/dev/null && cat /path/to/textpattern/version.php
    Affected if Textpattern version is present and matches the affected version range for this CVE (check against known vulnerable versions)
  2. Verify XML-RPC API endpoint is accessible
    Check if the XML-RPC endpoint exists and is accessible. The vulnerable file is rpc/TXP_RPCServer.php. Run: curl -X POST http://TARGET_HOST/textpattern/rpc/TXP_RPCServer.php -d '<?xml version="1.0"?><methodCall><methodName>mt.uploadImage</methodName></methodCall>'
    Affected if HTTP response returns XML content (indicates XML-RPC is enabled and responding)
  3. Confirm XML-RPC is enabled in configuration
    Check Textpattern configuration file (config.php) for XML-RPC settings. Run: grep -i 'xmlrpc' /path/to/textpattern/config.php
    Affected if XML-RPC is not explicitly disabled or the endpoint responds to requests (default configuration allows it)
  4. Check file upload permissions and paths
    Review the preferences for file uploads in the admin panel or database. Check for $this->prefs['file_max_upload_size'] and upload path settings in the database: SELECT name,val FROM txp_prefs WHERE name LIKE '%file%'
    Affected if File uploads are enabled and a custom upload path is configured (vulnerability allows escaping the intended upload directory)

A user is affected if they run a vulnerable Textpattern version with XML-RPC API enabled and accessible, allowing unauthenticated attackers to manipulate file.name parameters for path traversal during image uploads.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Disable the XML-RPC handler if unused; implement WAF rules to block path traversal patterns in upload parameters until the vendor patch is released.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5344 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5344 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data