CVE-2026-53492
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedcontainerd is an open-source container runtime. In Versions prior to 2.3.2, 2.2.5 and 2.1.9, the CRI implementation improperly trusts Container Device Interface (CDI) annotations found within untrusted checkpoint image metadata during container restoration. When restoring a container from a checkpoint, containerd preserves CDI-related annotations from the checkpoint archive rather than relying solely on the pod's create-time specification. This allows a user with pod creation permissions to bypass standard Kubernetes resource allocation and device plugin enforcement, injecting arbitrary CDI edits (such as device nodes and host mounts) into the restored container. Successful exploitation requires that the node has CDI enabled and contains a matching host CDI specification for the requested device; environments where CDI is disabled or lacking sensitive device specifications are not affected. This issue has been fixed in versions 2.3.2, 2.2.5 and 2.1.9.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencecontainerd's CRI implementation improperly trusts CDI annotations from untrusted checkpoint image metadata during container restoration. This allows users with pod creation permissions to inject arbitrary CDI edits (device nodes, host mounts) into restored containers, bypassing Kubernetes resource allocation and device plugin enforcement. Exploitation requires CDI to be enabled on the node with matching host CDI specifications.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.1.0, < 2.1.9>= 2.2.0, < 2.2.5>= 2.3.0, < 2.3.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check containerd versionRun `containerd --version` or check the version file in your containerd installation directoryAffected if Version is 2.1.0-2.1.8, 2.2.0-2.2.4, or 2.3.0-2.3.1 (falls within >=2.1.0 <2.1.9, >=2.2.0 <2.2.5, or >=2.3.0 <2.3.2)
-
Verify CDI is enabledCheck containerd configuration file (typically /etc/containerd/config.toml) for the CDI enable flag or look for CDI-related settings under the containerd runtime configurationAffected if CDI support is enabled in the containerd configuration (cdi.enabled or similar setting is true)
-
Confirm checkpoint/restore is in useInspect container runtime data or check for existing containers that were restored from checkpoints, or review audit logs for container restore operationsAffected if Checkpoint and restore functionality is being used to restore containers from checkpoint images on this node
-
Check for CDI device specificationsExamine the /etc/cdi or /var/lib/cdi directories for JSON device specification files, or run `ls /etc/cdi/` to list available CDI specificationsAffected if CDI device specifications exist on the node that could be injected into restored containers
A user is affected if containerd version is in the vulnerable range, CDI is enabled, and checkpoint restore is being used with CDI device specifications present on the node.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.1.92.2.52.3.2
Upgrade containerd to versions 2.3.2, 2.2.5, or 2.1.9. Alternatively, disable CDI or ensure no sensitive device specifications exist on nodes, and restrict pod creation permissions to trusted users.
containerd 2.3.2 (or 2.2.5 for 2.2.x branch, or 2.1.9 for 2.1.x branch)
- 1. Identify the currently installed containerd version using `containerd --version` or checking the package manager
- 2. Determine which branch of containerd is in use (2.1.x, 2.2.x, or 2.3.x) based on the current version
- 3. For containerd 2.1.x: Upgrade to version 2.1.9 or later
- 4. For containerd 2.2.x: Upgrade to version 2.2.5 or later
- 5. For containerd 2.3.x: Upgrade to version 2.3.2 or later
- 6. Upgrade method depends on installation method: for package managers use `apt-get update && apt-get install containerd` or `yum update containerd`; for binary installations download from the containerd releases page (github.com/containerd/containerd/releases)
- 7. After upgrade, restart the containerd service using `systemctl restart containerd` or `service containerd restart`
- 8. Verify the new version is running with `containerd --version`
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53492 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53492 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data