CVE-2026-53653
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGrav is a file-based Web platform. Prior to 1.7.53 and 2.0.0-rc.8, Grav allows an unauthenticated visitor to exhaust server memory and CPU by requesting image derivatives with oversized dimensions through URL query image actions such as forceResize in Grav::fallbackUrl, which passes request parameters to ImageMedium magic actions without a dimension or pixel ceiling. This issue is fixed in versions 1.7.53 and 2.0.0-rc.8.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGrav CMS allows unauthenticated visitors to trigger excessive resource consumption by requesting image derivatives with oversized dimensions via URL query parameters (e.g., forceResize). The ImageMedium class in Grav::fallbackUrl passes these parameters without enforcing dimension or pixel ceilings, leading to server memory and CPU exhaustion.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Grav CMS installationLocate the Grav installation by checking for the presence of 'index.php' and 'system/src/Grav' directory in the web root, or look for the 'vendor/twig/twig' directory which is part of Grav's dependencies.Affected if Grav CMS is found on the system
-
Determine installed Grav versionCheck the VERSION file in the Grav root directory, or inspect the 'version' field in composer.json in the system directory, or query the /admin console for the version information.Affected if The installed version is lower than 1.7.53 or 2.0.0-rc.8 (e.g., 1.7.x versions before 1.7.53, or 2.0.0-rc versions before rc.8)
-
Confirm image processing is accessibleVerify that the image processing endpoint is web-accessible by attempting a basic image request with a query parameter such as '?forceResize=100x100' on any image URL within the media manager or a page containing images.Affected if Image URLs with query parameters like forceResize, resize, or crop are processed without requiring authentication
-
Check if external requests can trigger image generationTest by sending an unauthenticated HTTP request to an image path with an oversized dimension parameter (e.g., ?forceResize=50000x50000) and observe if the server attempts to generate the derivative.Affected if The server accepts and attempts to process dimension parameters from unauthenticated requests without rejecting or limiting oversized values
The environment is affected if Grav CMS is running a version prior to 1.7.53 or 2.0.0-rc.8 and the image derivative generation feature is accessible to unauthenticated visitors.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Grav version 1.7.53 or 2.0.0-rc.8 or later, which implements required dimension and pixel ceilings to prevent resource exhaustion attacks.
Grav 1.7.53 or Grav 2.0.0-rc.8
- Verify your current Grav installation version by checking theVERSION file or admin panel
- Back up your Grav installation including all content, configuration, and user data
- For Grav 1.x users: Upgrade to version 1.7.53 or later
- For Grav 2.x users: Upgrade to version 2.0.0-rc.8 or later
- After upgrade, verify the ImageMedium class includes dimension limits by checking the commit at d9f9f0369a07ae5c96cde700c7949e1237b29cf6
- Test image resize functionality with normal and oversized dimensions to confirm the limit is enforced
- Monitor server resource usage after the upgrade to confirm the vulnerability is mitigated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53653 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53653 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data