CVE-2026-5366
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPrefect version 3.6.23 is vulnerable to remote code execution due to improper handling of user-controlled input in the `GitRepository` storage class. The `commit_sha` parameter, which is passed to git commands, lacks validation and does not include a `--` separator to distinguish user input from git flags. This allows attackers to inject arbitrary git flags, such as `--upload-pack`, enabling execution of external programs. Additionally, the `directories` parameter can be exploited to inject git flags during sparse-checkout operations. These vulnerabilities allow any user with deployment creation permissions to execute arbitrary commands on worker machines, compromising shared work pools in multi-tenant environments.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePrefect 3.6.23 GitRepository storage class improperly handles user-controlled `commit_sha` and `directories` parameters when constructing git commands. Without input validation or a `--` separator, attackers can inject git flags like `--upload-pack` to achieve arbitrary command execution on worker machines.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.6.23CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Prefect versionRun 'prefect --version' or 'pip show prefect' to determine the installed version of PrefectAffected if The version is 3.6.23
-
Identify GitRepository usageSearch deployment configuration files, flow code, or infrastructure-as-code definitions for imports or usage of 'GitRepository' from prefect or storage classesAffected if GitRepository storage class is configured in any deployment
-
Inspect deployment storage configurationsReview deployments via 'prefect deployment ls' and inspect storage blocks using 'prefect block ls' and 'prefect block get', looking for GitRepository-type blocksAffected if A GitRepository storage block exists with user-provided commit_sha or directories values
-
Check for exposed deployment creation endpointsIf Prefect Server or Cloud API is exposed, review access controls on deployment creation/modification endpointsAffected if Users with deployment creation permissions exist in a multi-tenant environment
-
Audit deployment creation permissionsReview IAM, API keys, or RBAC policies to identify which users or service accounts can create or modify deployments that reference GitRepository storageAffected if Non-admin users or service accounts have deployment creation/modification privileges
You are affected if running Prefect version 3.6.23 AND have deployments using GitRepository storage where commit_sha or directories parameters can be controlled by users with deployment creation permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement strict input validation for commit_sha (ensure valid SHA format) and add `--` separator before user input in all git command constructions. Apply the same fix to the directories parameter for sparse-checkout operations.
Prefect version > 3.6.23 (e.g., 3.6.24 or latest stable release)
- 1. Identify all Prefect deployments using GitRepository storage in version 3.6.23
- 2. Upgrade Prefect server and workers to a version newer than 3.6.23 (e.g., 3.6.24 or latest stable)
- 3. After upgrade, verify that the GitRepository storage class properly validates the commit_sha parameter and uses `--` separator in git commands
- 4. Test that the directories parameter is properly handled during sparse-checkout operations
- 5. Review deployment creation permissions to ensure only trusted users can create deployments with GitRepository storage
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5366 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5366 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data