CVE-2026-53815
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenClaw before 2026.5.19 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in message read actions that skips channel allowlist checks. Lower-trust callers can request messages from channels not intended for them by exploiting insufficient validation in the affected feature, potentially exposing sensitive channel messages.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOpenClaw before version 2026.5.19 has an authorization bypass vulnerability in its message read functionality. The application fails to properly validate channel allowlist permissions when processing message read requests, allowing lower-privileged users to access messages from channels outside their authorized scope.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2026.5.19CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OpenClaw installation and versionLocate the OpenClaw application installation and determine its installed version number. Common methods include: checking the application executable metadata, reviewing version files in the installation directory, or running 'openclaw --version' if a CLI is available.Affected if The installed version is lower than 2026.5.19
-
Verify message read functionality is presentConfirm that the OpenClaw message reading feature is enabled and accessible in the environment. Check application modules or feature flags related to message handling.Affected if Message read functionality exists and is accessible to users in the application
-
Examine channel allowlist configurationReview the OpenClaw configuration files or database entries that define channel access permissions. Look for settings that control which channels users at different trust levels can access.Affected if Channel allowlist permissions are defined but may not be properly enforced in message read operations
-
Review user privilege assignments and channel access mappingInspect the user role definitions and their associated channel access permissions. Identify any users with lower trust levels assigned to specific channel scopes.Affected if Users with lower privilege levels exist and have defined channel access restrictions
A user is affected if OpenClaw version is below 2026.5.19 AND the message read functionality is accessible to users with lower privilege levels who should be restricted to specific channel allowlists.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026.5.19
Upgrade to OpenClaw version 2026.5.19 or later. Additionally, implement explicit channel allowlist validation checks in all message read operations to ensure users can only access channels explicitly permitted for their trust level.
2026.5.19
- 1. Back up your current Openclaw installation and any associated databases
- 2. Review the release notes for version 2026.5.19 to understand changes
- 3. Download Openclaw version 2026.5.19 or later from the official repository
- 4. Stop the currently running Openclaw service
- 5. Install the upgraded version following standard installation procedures
- 6. Verify that the message read action now properly enforces channel allowlist checks
- 7. Test that users can only access channels they are authorized to view
- 8. Restart the Openclaw service
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53815 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53815 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data