CVE-2026-53819
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenClaw before 2026.5.27 contains an arbitrary code execution vulnerability in skill install flows where workspace .env files can override the Homebrew executable selection. Attackers with access to trusted operator workspaces can execute unintended Homebrew-compatible executables during skill setup to compromise the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOpenClaw before 2026.5.27 has an arbitrary code execution vulnerability where workspace .env files can manipulate Homebrew executable selection during skill install flows. Attackers with access to trusted operator workspaces can inject or redirect to malicious Homebrew-compatible executables, achieving code execution on the system during skill setup.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2026.5.27CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed OpenClaw versionRun 'openclaw --version' or look for the version file in the OpenClaw installation directoryAffected if The installed version is lower than 2026.5.27
-
Identify workspace .env filesSearch for .env files in operator workspace directories, typically found in the workspace root or ~/.openclaw/ directoryAffected if Any .env file exists in workspace directories that could contain Homebrew executable path overrides (look for variables like HOMEBREW_PATH, BREW_PATH, or executable paths)
-
Review skill install configurationExamine OpenClaw skill configuration files or settings to confirm skill install flows are enabled. Check for skill-related config in ~/.openclaw/skills/ or /etc/openclaw/Affected if Skill install flows are configured and enabled in the environment
-
Inspect executable path settingsCheck OpenClaw configuration files and any .env files for variables that specify Homebrew executable paths, such as HOMEBREW_BIN, BREW_EXECUTABLE, or PATH modificationsAffected if Executable path variables in .env or config files could allow overriding the default Homebrew binary location
You are affected if OpenClaw version is below 2026.5.27 AND workspace .env files exist that can influence Homebrew executable selection during skill installation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026.5.27
Update to OpenClaw version 2026.5.27 or later. Additionally, audit and sanitize workspace .env files to prevent override of executable paths, and implement verification/code signing for executables selected during skill installation flows.
OpenClaw 2026.5.27 or later
- 1. Verify the current OpenClaw installation version using: claw --version or the package manager used for installation
- 2. Backup any critical workspace configurations and .env files before performing the upgrade
- 3. Upgrade OpenClaw to version 2026.5.27 or later using the appropriate package manager (e.g., pip install openclaw>=2026.5.27, brew upgrade openclaw, or the method originally used for installation)
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking: claw --version
- 5. After upgrading, review workspace .env files to ensure no malicious PATH or executable overrides were introduced
- 6. Test that skill install flows work correctly with the updated version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53819 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53819 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data