CVE-2026-53831
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenClaw before 2026.5.18 contains a policy enforcement vulnerability in system.run safe-bin allowlist validation that allows shell expansion to modify command interpretation on POSIX nodes. Authenticated operators can exploit shell metacharacters in approved commands to read unintended node-local files and expose sensitive configuration data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOpenClaw's system.run function uses a safe-bin allowlist to restrict which commands operators can execute. The allowlist validation fails to properly sanitize shell metacharacters, allowing authenticated operators to inject additional commands or path traversal sequences through approved commands. This enables reading arbitrary local files on POSIX nodes by exploiting characters like ;, |, &, or ../ in what should be restricted commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2026.5.18CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OpenClaw installation and versionRun 'openclaw --version' or check the package manager for installed OpenClaw versionAffected if The installed version is earlier than 2026.5.18
-
Verify system.run function is accessibleCheck if the system.run function is enabled in OpenClaw's operator configuration or access control settingsAffected if system.run is enabled and accessible to operators or untrusted users
-
Examine the safe-bin allowlist configurationLocate and inspect the allowlist configuration file that defines permitted commands for system.runAffected if The allowlist exists and includes commands that could accept arguments containing shell metacharacters
-
Test for shell metacharacter filteringAttempt a controlled test using a whitelisted command with a shell metacharacter (such as backticks or $()) to see if the character is passed through or rejectedAffected if Shell metacharacters are not stripped or rejected by the allowlist validation, allowing command injection
-
Review operator access controlsCheck which operator roles have permission to invoke system.run and whether untrusted operators can access this functionAffected if Untrusted or low-privilege operators have access to system.run without additional restrictions
You are affected if OpenClaw version is before 2026.5.18 AND system.run is enabled for operators, since the allowlist validation fails to filter shell metacharacters and could allow injection attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026.5.18
Sanitize all command arguments to escape or remove shell metacharacters before execution, or refactor to use exec-family functions with explicit arguments instead of shell invocation. Update to OpenClaw 2026.5.18 or later if a patched version is available.
OpenClaw 2026.5.18
- 1. Inventory all OpenClaw deployments and identify instances running versions before 2026.5.18
- 2. Review the system.run safe-bin allowlist configuration to identify any commands that may contain shell metacharacters (such as $, `, |, ;, >, <, etc.)
- 3. Backup current OpenClaw configuration and database before performing the upgrade
- 4. Upgrade OpenClaw to version 2026.5.18 or later by following the official upgrade documentation
- 5. After upgrading, verify that the safe-bin allowlist properly rejects or sanitizes shell metacharacters in commands
- 6. Audit access logs and configurations for any signs of exploitation prior to the upgrade
- 7. Test that legitimate commands in the allowlist still function correctly post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,248.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53831 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53831 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data