OpenclawApplication

CVE-2026-53834

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2026.4.27 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
OpenClaw before 2026.4.27 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in QQBot pre-dispatch slash commands that allows authenticated senders to skip allowFrom policy checks. Attackers can invoke slash commands before configured access control policies are applied, potentially triggering command handling from blocked senders depending on operator configuration.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

OpenClaw QQBot has an authorization bypass in pre-dispatch slash command handling where the allowFrom policy checks are not applied before command execution. Authenticated senders can invoke slash commands before access control policies are evaluated, allowing blocked users to trigger command handlers if operators have configured certain policy settings.

MitigationUpgrade OpenClaw to version 2026.4.27 or later to receive the patch that enforces allowFrom policy checks before slash command dispatch.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OpenclawApplication
Affected:< 2026.4.27

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed OpenClaw version
    Locate the OpenClaw installation and retrieve its version information, typically via package manager, application metadata, or version file included with the software
    Affected if The installed version is earlier than 2026.4.27
  2. Confirm QQBot module is active
    Inspect the OpenClaw configuration or running services to determine whether the QQBot component is enabled and operational
    Affected if QQBot is enabled and running in the environment
  3. Verify slash commands are configured
    Review the QQBot configuration files or command registration settings to identify whether slash command handlers are defined and active
    Affected if Slash commands are registered and enabled in QQBot
  4. Examine allowFrom policy settings
    Inspect the QQBot access control policy configuration, specifically the allowFrom rules that control which users or sources can invoke slash commands
    Affected if allowFrom policies exist but slash commands can be triggered before these policies are evaluated

The environment is affected if OpenClaw version is below 2026.4.27, QQBot is enabled with slash commands, and the allowFrom policy enforcement occurs after command dispatch rather than before.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2026.4.27 or later
Fixed in 2026.4.27
Interim mitigation

Upgrade OpenClaw to version 2026.4.27 or later to receive the patch that enforces allowFrom policy checks before slash command dispatch.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

OpenClaw 2026.4.27

  1. 1. Identify the current version of OpenClaw installed in your environment
  2. 2. Create a backup of your current OpenClaw configuration and data
  3. 3. Upgrade OpenClaw to version 2026.4.27 or later
  4. 4. After upgrade, verify that the allowFrom policy checks are now properly enforced for pre-dispatch slash commands
  5. 5. Test that slash commands from blocked senders are correctly rejected by the access control policy

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Openclaw Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53834 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53834 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data