CVE-2026-53842
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenClaw before 2026.5.2 contains an environment variable injection vulnerability allowing workspace .env files to influence Python runtime selection through CLOUDSDK_PYTHON during Gmail setup gcloud execution. Attackers with repository access can manipulate the CLOUDSDK_PYTHON variable to execute setup through unintended local Python paths, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOpenClaw before 2026.5.2 is vulnerable to environment variable injection via workspace .env files that can set CLOUDSDK_PYTHON to an attacker-controlled Python interpreter path. During Gmail setup gcloud execution, the application uses this environment variable to select the Python runtime, allowing attackers with repository access to achieve arbitrary code execution by pointing to malicious Python binaries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2026.5.2= 2026.5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check OpenClaw versionRun 'openclaw --version' or check the installed package version using your package manager (pip show openclaw, npm list openclaw, etc.)Affected if Version is before 2026.5.2 or exactly 2026.5.2
-
Inspect workspace .env filesSearch for .env files in the workspace/repository (find . -name '.env' 2>/dev/null) and review their contents for any CLOUDSDK_PYTHON settingAffected if A .env file exists and contains CLOUDSDK_PYTHON set to a custom or untrusted path
-
Check current environment for CLOUDSDK_PYTHONRun 'echo $CLOUDSDK_PYTHON' or 'Get-ChildItem Env:CLOUDSDK_PYTHON' in PowerShell on WindowsAffected if CLOUDSDK_PYTHON is set to any path other than the system Python interpreter (e.g., points to a non-standard or user-controlled location)
-
Review workspace configuration filesCheck workspace config files (openclaw.json, workspace.yaml, or similar) for any Python path overrides or environment variable settings related to gcloudAffected if Configuration specifies a custom Python path or passes CLOUDSDK_PYTHON to gcloud operations
-
Audit repository access and .env file historyReview git log for recent changes to .env files (git log --all --full-history -- .env) and check for untrusted contributors with write access to .env filesAffected if Any untrusted or external contributor has modified .env files in the repository
A user is affected if OpenClaw version is less than 2026.5.2 or equals 2026.5.2 AND there is a CLOUDSDK_PYTHON environment variable in a .env file or the current environment pointing to a non-standard Python path.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026.5.2
Upgrade to OpenClaw 2026.5.2 or later. Additionally, validate and restrict environment variables from .env files, particularly CLOUDSDK_PYTHON, and use a hardened/sanitized Python path configuration for gcloud operations.
Openclaw 2026.5.2 or later stable release
- 1. Identify all Openclaw installations in the environment running version < 2026.5.2 or = 2026.5.2
- 2. Backup all workspace .env files and Openclaw configuration before proceeding
- 3. Upgrade Openclaw to version 2026.5.2 or later following standard upgrade procedures
- 4. After upgrade, audit all workspace .env files to ensure CLOUDSDK_PYTHON is not set to untrusted paths
- 5. Implement workspace .env file validation to prevent future setting of CLOUDSDK_PYTHON or other interpreter path variables
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Openclaw version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53842 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53842 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data