CVE-2026-53850
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenClaw before 2026.4.25 contains a control scope enforcement bypass vulnerability in the focus command that allows authenticated callers to execute the command without proper authorization checks. Attackers can trigger the focus command to change focus state outside intended caller authority, potentially enabling unauthorized operations depending on gateway configuration and input trust levels.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOpenClaw before version 2026.4.25 has a control scope enforcement bypass in the focus command. The vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute the focus command without proper authorization checks, enabling them to change focus state outside their intended caller authority scope. This is an access control bypass that could allow unauthorized operations depending on gateway configuration and trust levels.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2026.4.25= 2026.4.25CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check OpenClaw versionRun 'openclaw --version' or check the package manifest to identify the installed OpenClaw versionAffected if Installed version is earlier than 2026.4.25 or exactly 2026.4.25
-
Verify focus command availabilityDetermine if the focus command is accessible to authenticated users in your environment by reviewing command documentation or attempting to invoke itAffected if The focus command is exposed and executable by authenticated users
-
Inspect focus command authorization configurationReview the configuration files or access control settings that govern the focus command to determine if scope enforcement checks are definedAffected if No explicit authorization scope constraints are configured for the focus command or they are missing
-
Review focus command usage logsExamine authentication and command execution logs for instances where the focus command was used, particularly checking for operations outside expected caller boundariesAffected if Logs show focus command execution occurring outside the caller's authorized scope
-
Assess gateway trust configurationInspect the gateway or API gateway configuration to determine trust levels between callers and the focus command execution contextAffected if Gateway is configured with high trust levels that bypass scope validation for authenticated users
A user is affected if OpenClaw version is before 2026.4.25 AND the focus command is accessible to authenticated users without proper scope enforcement checks
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026.4.25
Upgrade to OpenClaw version 2026.4.25 or later which contains the fix. Additionally, review and enforce proper authorization checks on the focus command to ensure callers can only change focus states within their authorized scope.
OpenClaw 2026.4.25 or later
- 1. Identify the current installed version of OpenClaw by checking the application or configuration files
- 2. Download OpenClaw version 2026.4.25 or a later stable release from the official repository (github.com)
- 3. Review release notes to confirm the security fix for the focus command authorization bypass is included
- 4. Create a backup of the current OpenClaw configuration and data directory
- 5. Stop the OpenClaw service or application
- 6. Install the upgraded version (2026.4.25 or later) following standard upgrade procedures
- 7. Verify the focus command now properly enforces authorization checks
- 8. Restart the OpenClaw service
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53850 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53850 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data