OpenclawApplication

CVE-2026-53861

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-16
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2026.5.6 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
OpenClaw before 2026.5.6 contains an allowlist bypass vulnerability in the macOS Swift exec feature that misses combined POSIX inline-command flags. Attackers can execute shell content outside the intended allowlist check by using combined flag forms, potentially allowing unauthorized command execution depending on operator configuration.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

OpenClaw before 2026.5.6 has an allowlist bypass in its macOS Swift exec feature due to incomplete parsing of combined POSIX inline-command flags. The allowlist validation only checks for individual flag forms (e.g., -x) but misses combined forms (e.g., -xyz), allowing attackers to embed shell content outside the intended allowlist boundaries and potentially execute unauthorized commands.

MitigationUpgrade to OpenClaw 2026.5.6 or later which includes proper handling of combined POSIX flags in the allowlist validation. If immediate upgrade is not possible, review and restrict operator configurations to limit exposure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OpenclawApplication
Affected:< 2026.5.6= 2026.5.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed OpenClaw version
    Run 'openclaw --version' or check the application bundle info to retrieve the version number
    Affected if The installed version is any version before the patched release (2026.5.6) or exactly 2026.5.6
  2. Identify if macOS Swift exec feature is enabled
    Review OpenClaw configuration files or operator settings to see if the Swift exec module is active and accessible to operators
    Affected if The macOS Swift exec feature is enabled and accessible to non-admin operators
  3. Locate allowlist configuration for the exec feature
    Search configuration files (typically in /etc/openclaw/, ~/.openclaw/, or application data directories) for exec-related allowlist settings
    Affected if An allowlist is configured but the configuration does not explicitly account for combined flag formats like -abc
  4. Inspect operator command execution logs
    Review OpenClaw execution logs or audit trails for any exec commands containing combined flag patterns (e.g., flags that appear as single strings rather than space-separated arguments)
    Affected if Commands using combined POSIX-style flags (-abc) are being executed when they should have been blocked by the allowlist

You are affected if OpenClaw is installed with the macOS Swift exec feature enabled and your current version is any release before the patched version 2026.5.6.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2026.5.6 or later
Fixed in 2026.5.6
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to OpenClaw 2026.5.6 or later which includes proper handling of combined POSIX flags in the allowlist validation. If immediate upgrade is not possible, review and restrict operator configurations to limit exposure.

Recommended fix High confidence

2026.5.6

  1. Upgrade OpenClaw to version 2026.5.6 or later
  2. After upgrading, verify the macOS Swift exec feature now properly validates combined POSIX inline-command flags (e.g., -c, -s flags) within the allowlist
  3. Test that the allowlist correctly blocks shell content attempting to bypass checks using combined flag forms
  4. Confirm the upgrade completed successfully by checking the OpenClaw version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Openclaw Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53861 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53861 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data