CVE-2026-53930
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, the base-migration endpoint accepted a caller-supplied URL that the migration worker dereferenced without enforcing protocol or destination, allowing scheme abuse (file:, ftp:, etc.) and probing of internal HTTP destinations. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNocoDB's base-migration endpoint accepts caller-supplied URLs without validating the protocol or destination, allowing the migration worker to dereference arbitrary URLs. This enables scheme abuse (file:, ftp:, etc.) and SSRF attacks to probe internal HTTP services.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify NocoDB installationCheck if NocoDB is running in your environment by querying the process list, container registry, or installed packagesAffected if NocoDB is installed and running
-
Determine NocoDB versionRun npm list nocodb or check the Docker image tag, package.json, or NocoDB admin UI About page for the version numberAffected if Version is earlier than 2026.05.1
-
Identify base-migration endpoint exposureCheck network exposure of the NocoDB API endpoint at /api/v1/db/migration or similar base-migration paths using curl or network scanning toolsAffected if The migration endpoint is externally accessible without authentication or is accessible to untrusted users
-
Review API access controlsExamine NocoDB authentication configuration and API access policies to determine if the migration endpoint permits unauthenticated or low-privilege accessAffected if The base-migration endpoint allows requests from unauthenticated or low-privilege users
-
Check for exploitation indicatorsReview application logs for requests to the migration endpoint with unusual URL schemes (file:, ftp:, http://localhost, http://127.0.0.1) or patterns indicating internal network probingAffected if Suspicious URL schemes or internal network requests appear in logs
If NocoDB version is below 2026.05.1 and the base-migration endpoint is accessible to untrusted users, the environment is vulnerable
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade NocoDB to version 2026.05.1 or later, which implements proper URL validation enforcing allowed protocols and blocking internal destination probing.
2026.05.1
- Upgrade NocoDB to version 2026.05.1 or later to remediate the SSRF vulnerability in the base-migration endpoint
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53930 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53930 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data