CVE-2026-53950
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited@tryghost/activitypub is Ghost’s social/federation client app. Prior to 3.1.0, the ActivityPub client in Ghost was vulnerable to JavaScript injection on posts shared by a maliciously customised ActivityPub server. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe @tryghost/activitypub package versions prior to 3.1.0 are vulnerable to JavaScript injection. The ActivityPub client fails to properly sanitize or validate content received from ActivityPub servers, allowing a maliciously customized server to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript code in posts shared to the Ghost instance.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify @tryghost/activitypub package versionRun 'npm list @tryghost/activitypub' or check the package.json dependencies in your Ghost installation directoryAffected if The installed version is lower than 3.1.0 or the package is not listed in your dependencies but ActivityPub functionality exists
-
Confirm ActivityPub module is enabledCheck your Ghost config file (config.production.json or config.development.json) for the 'activitypub' key under 'labs' or 'api' settings, or inspect the active plugins/modulesAffected if ActivityPub integration is explicitly enabled in the configuration
-
Verify ActivityPub incoming content handlingReview your Ghost activity logs or database records for entries in tables related to ActivityPub inbox processing (e.g., any table storing inbound ActivityPub notes or posts)Affected if The instance processes or stores incoming ActivityPub content from external servers
-
Check for external ActivityPub server connectionsInspect the database or configuration for ActivityPub actor/remote profiles that your Ghost instance follows or has federated withAffected if The Ghost instance has established federated connections to external ActivityPub servers or accepts inbound posts from them
You are affected if @tryghost/activitypub version is below 3.1.0 AND the ActivityPub feature is enabled with potential exposure to external ActivityPub servers sending content
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade @tryghost/activitypub to version 3.1.0 or later to remediate this vulnerability.
@tryghost/activitypub version 3.1.0
- Identify the current version of @tryghost/activitypub in your Ghost installation by checking package.json or lock file
- Run 'npm install @tryghost/[email protected]' to upgrade to the fixed version
- Verify the upgrade was successful by confirming the installed version matches 3.1.0
- Test ActivityPub functionality to ensure the upgrade does not break existing features
- Deploy the updated package to your production environment
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-53950 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-53950 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data