CVE-2026-5396
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Fluent Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in all versions up to, and including, 6.1.21. This is due to the SubmissionPolicy class authorizing submission-level actions (read, modify, delete, add notes) based on a user-supplied `form_id` query parameter. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Fluent Forms Manager access restricted to specific forms, to read, modify status, add notes to, and permanently delete form submissions belonging to any other form by spoofing the form_id parameter to a form they are authorized for.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Fluent Forms plugin's SubmissionPolicy class authorizes submission actions (read, modify, delete, add notes) based on a user-supplied `form_id` query parameter without properly validating that the requesting user has permission for that specific form. This IDOR-style vulnerability allows authenticated attackers with limited Fluent Forms Manager access to manipulate the form_id parameter to access, modify status, add notes to, or permanently delete submissions belonging to any form on the site.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Fluent Forms plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins and verify Fluent Forms appears in the list of installed pluginsAffected if Fluent Forms plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed Fluent Forms versionIn the Plugins list, find Fluent Forms and note the version number displayed; compare this against the affected range (versions prior to 6.1.22)Affected if The installed version is earlier than 6.1.22
-
Verify the SubmissionPolicy class is presentCheck the plugin files for the presence of a SubmissionPolicy class file, typically located in the includes or classes directory of the Fluent Forms pluginAffected if The SubmissionPolicy class exists and handles submission actions
-
Check for users with form Manager capabilitiesIn WordPress admin, go to Users > All Users and review user roles; identify any users assigned to roles that include form Manager or submission management capabilitiesAffected if There are users with limited form Manager access to the plugin
-
Test access to submissions via manipulated form_id parameterUsing a browser or HTTP tool, access the submissions endpoint (typically /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php or a submissions list page) with a form_id parameter pointing to a form the current user should not have access to; observe if submissions from other forms are returned or modifiableAffected if A user with limited form access can view, modify, delete, or add notes to submissions from forms they do not own by manipulating the form_id parameter
The environment is affected if Fluent Forms version is earlier than 6.1.22 and users with limited form Manager permissions can access or manipulate submissions from forms outside their assigned scope by manipulating the form_id parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to version 6.1.22 or later when available. As an interim measure, audit user roles and permissions in Fluent Forms, and consider using a web application firewall to detect anomalous form_id parameter manipulation.
Latest version after 6.1.21 (check WordPress plugin repository for current stable release)
- Check the WordPress admin dashboard for available plugin updates under Dashboard > Updates
- Update Fluent Forms plugin to the latest version available in the WordPress plugin repository
- Alternatively, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins > Fluent Forms and click 'Update Now' if an update is available
- After updating, verify that form submission permissions are working correctly by testing access controls between forms
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5396 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5396 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data