CVE-2026-54231
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA content injection vulnerability was found in the ABRT post-create event handler scripts in libreport. The event script queries the systemd journal for log entries matching the crashed process and writes the results to files in the dump directory without sanitizing embedded control characters. A local user can inject arbitrary content into the journal output by embedding newline characters in syslog messages, controlling the content that root writes to dump directory files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA content injection vulnerability exists in ABRT's post-create event handler scripts in libreport. The event script queries the systemd journal for log entries matching crashed processes and writes results to dump directory files without sanitizing embedded control characters. A local attacker can inject arbitrary content by embedding newline characters in syslog messages, influencing what root writes to dump directory files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 43= 44= 7.0= 8.0all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if ABRT or libreport packages are installedRun 'rpm -qa | grep -E "(abrt|libreport)"' or 'dnf list installed | grep -E "(abrt|libreport)"' to list installed packagesAffected if Either abrt or libreport packages are present on the system
-
Identify installed libreport versionRun 'rpm -q libreport' or 'rpm -qi libreport' to get the exact version numberAffected if The version matches Fedora 43/44, RHEL 7.0/8.0, or is any version of the Abrt Project Abrt package
-
Verify systemd journal integration is enabled in ABRTCheck ABRT configuration files in /etc/abrt/plugins/ or /etc/libreport/plugins/ for journal.conf or similar, and look for settings that enable journal queryingAffected if Systemd journal plugin (journal) is enabled in ABRT configuration
-
Confirm post-create event handler configurationExamine /etc/abrt/events/ or /etc/libreport/events/ for post-create event handlers that process systemd journal output, and check if they are enabledAffected if A post-create event handler exists and is active that writes journal output to dump directories
-
Inspect dump directory settingsCheck ABRT configuration in /etc/abrt/abrt.conf or /etc/libreport/libreport.conf for DumpDir location and confirm directories are writableAffected if Dump directories are configured and accessible to the ABRT service
The system is affected if libreport or abrt packages are installed with versions matching Fedora 43/44, RHEL 7.0/8.0, or any Abrt Project version, and the systemd journal integration with post-create event handlers is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement sanitization of control characters (especially newlines) in journal output before writing to dump directory files, or validate syslog message input in the event handler script.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-54231 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-54231 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data