CWE-321Weakness · CWE-321

CVE-2026-5426

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Hard-coded ASP.NET/IIS machineKey value in Digital Knowledge KnowledgeDeliver deployments prior to February 24, 2026 allows adversaries to circumvent ViewState validation mechanisms and achieve remote code execution via malicious ViewState deserialization attacks

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Digital Knowledge KnowledgeDeliver deployments contain a hard-coded ASP.NET/IIS machineKey value that allows adversaries to forge ViewState tokens. Since ViewState validation relies on this key, attackers can craft malicious serialized payloads to achieve remote code execution.

MitigationReplace the hard-coded machineKey with a unique, cryptographically strong value generated for each environment, update all relevant configuration files, and invalidate existing sessions/tokens that may have been compromised.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate KnowledgeDeliver installation directory
    Search for folders named 'KnowledgeDeliver', 'KD', or check common IIS web root paths (C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\, /var/www/, /opt/) for KnowledgeDeliver application files
    Affected if KnowledgeDeliver is not installed on the system
  2. Find web.config or machine.config files
    Search the KnowledgeDeliver installation directory for web.config, machine.config, or app.config files, typically found in the root or bin folders
    Affected if No configuration files exist in the application directory
  3. Locate machineKey element in configuration
    Open the found configuration files and search for the <machineKey> element within <system.web> section
    Affected if No machineKey element is present in the configuration
  4. Examine machineKey value for hard-coded content
    Inspect the validationKey and decryptionKey attributes within the <machineKey> element. Check if the values are static (long alphanumeric strings) rather than dynamically generated or set to 'AutoGenerate'
    Affected if The machineKey contains static validationKey or decryptionKey values instead of 'AutoGenerate' or environment-specific dynamically generated keys
  5. Verify key uniqueness across deployments
    Compare the machineKey values from this installation against known hard-coded default key values, or check if multiple environments share identical keys
    Affected if The machineKey value matches known hard-coded defaults or is identical to keys used in other environments

The environment is affected if KnowledgeDeliver is installed and the machineKey element in its configuration files contains static, hard-coded validationKey or decryptionKey values rather than dynamically generated or unique per-environment keys.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace the hard-coded machineKey with a unique, cryptographically strong value generated for each environment, update all relevant configuration files, and invalidate existing sessions/tokens that may have been compromised.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,160
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5426 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5426 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data