Authorization Bypass (IDOR)Weakness · CWE-639

CVE-2026-54322

HIGH · 7.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
83/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Daytona is a secure and elastic infrastructure runtime for AI-generated code execution and agent workflows. Prior to 0.185.0, Daytona's organization role update and delete endpoints authorized the caller as an owner of the organization named in the request path, but resolved and mutated the target role by its identifier alone, without verifying the role belonged to that organization. An authenticated user who owns any organization (organizations are self-service) could therefore modify the permissions of, or delete, a role belonging to a different organization, given that role's identifier. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.185.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Daytona prior to 0.185.0 had an IDOR vulnerability in organization role update and delete endpoints. The endpoints correctly authorized the caller as an owner of the organization in the request path, but failed to verify that the target role actually belonged to that organization - the role was resolved by identifier alone. An authenticated user owning any self-service organization could manipulate roles from other organizations by knowing their ID.

MitigationUpgrade to Daytona 0.185.0 or later. If upgrading is not possible immediately, implement interim access controls that verify the role's organization_id matches the organization in the request before allowing modifications.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine the installed Daytona version
    Run 'daytona version' or check the container/image metadata where Daytona is deployed
    Affected if The installed version is earlier than 0.185.0
  2. Confirm the role update API is accessible
    Check if the /api/v1/organization/{orgId}/roles/{roleId} endpoint (PUT or PATCH method) is exposed in your Daytona deployment
    Affected if The endpoint is reachable and your Daytona version is below 0.185.0
  3. Confirm the role delete API is accessible
    Check if the /api/v1/organization/{orgId}/roles/{roleId} endpoint (DELETE method) is exposed in your Daytona deployment
    Affected if The endpoint is reachable and your Daytona version is below 0.185.0
  4. Review access logs for cross-organization role operations
    Search authentication and API logs for PUT/PATCH/DELETE requests to /organization/*/roles/* where the authenticated user's organization differs from the organization in the request path
    Affected if Such requests exist and your Daytona version is below 0.185.0

You are affected if Daytona version is below 0.185.0 and the organization role update or delete endpoints are accessible to authenticated users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to Daytona 0.185.0 or later. If upgrading is not possible immediately, implement interim access controls that verify the role's organization_id matches the organization in the request before allowing modifications.

Recommended fix High confidence

0.185.0

  1. Upgrade Daytona to version 0.185.0 or later

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,820
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,512.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-54322 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-54322 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data