CVE-2026-54429
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced (All versions). Affected devices do not properly handle high-volume multicast network traffic, which can exhaust available memory resources in the affected application. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker on the local network segment to cause a denial-of-service condition of the affected application. The affected application becomes inaccessible and requires a manual restart; no project data is lost. Successful exploitation requires a specific project configuration to be already active on the targeted instance.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced fails to properly handle high-volume multicast network traffic, causing memory resource exhaustion. An unauthenticated attacker on the local network segment can send specially crafted multicast traffic to trigger a denial-of-service condition, rendering the application inaccessible until manual restart. Exploitation requires a specific project configuration to be active on the target instance.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced installation and versionOpen Windows Control Panel > Programs and Features, locate SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced in the list, and note the installed version. Alternatively, right-click the application executable in its installation directory (typically under C:\Program Files\Siemens\) and view Properties > Details to find the File Version.Affected if The installed version matches any version of SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced that has not yet received the vendor patch for this vulnerability.
-
Confirm whether a project configuration is loaded and activeLaunch SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced and examine the runtime interface or project explorer panel. Look for an active project configuration currently loaded in the simulation environment. Check if the PLCSIM Advanced runtime shows a loaded project as opposed to an empty or idle state.Affected if A specific project configuration is actively loaded in the PLCSIM Advanced instance, which is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable.
-
Monitor network interface for anomalous multicast trafficUse a network capture tool such as Wireshark or Microsoft Network Monitor to capture traffic on the active network interface. Apply a filter for multicast traffic (e.g., multicast IP ranges like 224.0.0.0/4 or IGMP traffic). Observe the volume and frequency of incoming multicast packets over a period of several minutes.Affected if High-volume or unusually frequent multicast traffic is being received on the network segment where the PLCSIM Advanced instance is operating.
-
Check for memory resource exhaustion on the host systemOpen Windows Task Manager, go to the Processes or Details tab, and locate the PLCSIM Advanced executable (typically S7ProSim.exe or similar). Monitor the Memory (Private Working Set) column for continuously increasing memory usage. Also check if the application becomes unresponsive or exhibits extremely high memory consumption.Affected if The PLCSIM Advanced process exhibits steadily increasing memory consumption or consumes excessive system memory, indicating the vulnerability may be triggered.
A user is affected if SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced is running with an active project configuration and the host system is receiving high-volume multicast traffic that causes the application to become unresponsive due to memory exhaustion.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches when available; meanwhile, implement network segmentation to restrict local network access and monitor for anomalous multicast traffic patterns on the industrial network segment.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-54429 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-54429 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data