CVE-2026-5444
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA heap buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the PAM image parsing logic. When Orthanc processes a crafted PAM image embedded in a DICOM file, image dimensions are multiplied using 32-bit unsigned arithmetic. Specially chosen values can cause an integer overflow during buffer size calculation, resulting in the allocation of a small buffer followed by a much larger write operation during pixel processing.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHeap buffer overflow in Orthanc's PAM image parsing. When processing crafted PAM images embedded in DICOM files, 32-bit unsigned multiplication of image dimensions can overflow during buffer size calculation, causing a small buffer to be allocated followed by an oversized write during pixel processing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.12.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Orthanc versionRun 'orthanc --version' or check the version displayed in the Orthanc web interface under 'System' or 'About'. If using a package manager, use 'dpkg -l orthanc' or 'rpm -qi orthanc' depending on your system.Affected if The installed version is lower than 1.12.11 (e.g., 1.12.10, 1.12.9, etc.)
-
Confirm Orthanc is running and processing DICOM dataVerify the Orthanc service is active via 'systemctl status orthanc' or by accessing the Orthanc REST API at http://localhost:8042/system to check the status.Affected if Orthanc is running and accepting DICOM files for processing
-
Determine if PAM image decoding is activeOrthanc decodes PAM images as part of standard DICOM image processing. Check if the 'DecodeDicom' configuration option in orthanc.json is not explicitly disabled, or verify that the built-in DICOM decoding is not overridden.Affected if DICOM decoding is enabled (default behavior) - the vulnerability applies automatically when PAM images are processed
-
Inspect for PAM images in recent DICOM transfersReview Orthanc logs or check the /instances endpoint via the REST API to identify if DICOM files containing PAM (PAM = Pixel Arithmetic Module, part of DICOM Transfer Syntax) are being received or processed.Affected if DICOM files using PAM transfer syntax are being processed by the Orthanc instance
You are affected if Orthanc version is below 1.12.11 AND the system is processing DICOM files that may contain PAM images, since the overflow occurs during PAM image parsing regardless of configuration (DICOM decoding is enabled by default).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.12.11
Apply vendor patch when available. Until then, sanitize or reject PAM images with unusually large dimension values before processing. Implement bounds checking on dimension multiplication using checked arithmetic or 64-bit integers.
Orthanc 1.12.11
- 1. Back up your current Orthanc configuration and any custom plugins.
- 2. Stop the Orthanc service.
- 3. Upgrade Orthanc to version 1.12.11 or later.
- 4. Verify the upgrade by checking the Orthanc version (e.g., orthanc --version).
- 5. Test that DICOM file processing works correctly with your workflow.
- 6. Restart the Orthanc service.
- 7. Monitor logs for any issues and verify the vulnerability is no longer present.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5444 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5444 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data