Jupyterlab GitApplication · Jupyter

CVE-2026-54527

CRITICAL · 9.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.54.0 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Patch available 6 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
JupyterLab Git is a Git extension for JupyterLab. From 0.30.0b3 before 0.54.0, the PlainTextDiff.ts createHeader() method passes Git filenames directly to innerHTML when rendering renamed files in commit history, allowing a crafted filename to execute JavaScript when a victim views the rename diff in the Git History tab. This issue is fixed in version 0.54.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the JupyterLab Git extension where the createHeader() method in PlainTextDiff.ts directly injects Git filenames into innerHTML when rendering rename diffs in the Git History view, allowing malicious filenames to execute arbitrary JavaScript in victim browsers.

MitigationUpgrade the JupyterLab Git extension to version 0.54.0 or later. Until upgrade is possible, avoid viewing commit history of repositories with untrusted contributors.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Jupyterlab GitApplication
Affected:>= 0.30.1, < 0.54.0= 0.30.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify JupyterLab Git extension version
    Run 'jupyter labextension list' or check package.json in the lab environment to find the @jupyterlab/git extension version
    Affected if The installed version is >= 0.30.0 and < 0.54.0, or equals exactly 0.30.0
  2. Confirm Git extension is loaded
    Verify that the JupyterLab Git extension appears in 'jupyter labextension list' output as enabled/active
    Affected if The extension is installed and active, making the vulnerable code path accessible
  3. Check Git History view accessibility
    In JupyterLab, verify access to the Git extension sidebar and its History view feature for any repository
    Affected if The Git History view can be opened, which is required for the vulnerable createHeader() method to execute
  4. Identify repositories with untrusted contributors
    Review any Git repositories used in JupyterLab for presence of commits from untrusted sources or unusual filename patterns
    Affected if Repositories contain commits from untrusted contributors, which could contain malicious filenames that trigger the XSS

A user is affected if the JupyterLab Git extension version falls within 0.30.0 or >= 0.30.1 but < 0.54.0, and they have access to the Git History view for repositories that may contain untrusted Git filenames.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.54.0 or later
Fixed in 0.54.0
Vendor patch github.com →
Interim mitigation

Upgrade the JupyterLab Git extension to version 0.54.0 or later. Until upgrade is possible, avoid viewing commit history of repositories with untrusted contributors.

Recommended fix High confidence

0.54.0

  1. Check current version of jupyterlab-git: run `pip show jupyterlab-git` or `jupyter labextension list`
  2. Upgrade jupyterlab-git to version 0.54.0 or later: run `pip install --upgrade jupyterlab-git>=0.54.0` or `conda install -c conda-forge jupyterlab-git>=0.54.0`
  3. Restart JupyterLab to ensure the patched extension is loaded

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Jupyterlab Git Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,570
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-54527 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-54527 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data