CVE-2026-54563
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. Prior to 4.16.1, a Cloudreve WebDAV account rooted at a configured folder can send paths such as /dav/%2e%2e/outside.txt because stripPrefix in pkg/webdav/webdav.go joins the decoded request suffix to the account root with fs.URI.JoinRaw without checking containment, allowing the scoped credential to read and list files outside the configured folder and writable credentials to create, overwrite, move, or delete them. This issue is reported as fixed in version 4.16.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCloudreve's WebDAV component suffers from a path traversal vulnerability in the stripPrefix function (pkg/webdav/webdav.go). The function joins the decoded request path suffix to the account root using fs.URI.JoinRaw without validating containment, allowing authenticated WebDAV users to escape the scoped folder using URL-encoded path traversal sequences like %2e%2e (../). Read-only credentials can list and read files outside the scope; writable credentials can also create, modify, move, or delete files outside the configured folder.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Cloudreve installation and versionLocate the Cloudreve binary or Docker container, then run 'cloudreve --version' or inspect the container image tag to determine the installed version.Affected if The installed version is earlier than 4.16.1 (the first version with the fix).
-
Confirm WebDAV is enabledExamine the Cloudreve configuration file (usually conf.ini or config.yaml) for the [webdav] section, or check if the /webdav endpoint responds to requests.Affected if WebDAV is enabled and accessible - the vulnerability only applies when the WebDAV component is running.
-
Identify WebDAV user accountsLog into the Cloudreve admin panel and navigate to User Management, or query the database for users with WebDAV access permissions.Affected if There are one or more WebDAV users configured - exploitation requires authenticated access.
-
Test for path traversal vulnerabilityUsing a WebDAV client (such as cadaver or a tool like curl with PROPFIND/GET requests), attempt to access a path outside the user's configured storage scope by using URL-encoded traversal sequences (e.g., request /webdav/%2e%2e%2f..%2f).Affected if The response returns files or allows operations outside the user's assigned root folder, indicating the path containment check is missing.
A user is affected if they run a Cloudreve version below 4.16.1 with WebDAV enabled and have WebDAV-accessible user accounts, allowing authenticated users to escape their scoped folder via path traversal sequences.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Cloudreve version 4.16.1 or later, which implements proper path containment validation in the WebDAV stripPrefix function to prevent directory traversal.
4.16.1
- 1. Back up your current Cloudreve installation and configuration
- 2. Download Cloudreve version 4.16.1 from the official GitHub releases page
- 3. Stop the Cloudreve service
- 4. Replace the existing Cloudreve binary with the new version 4.16.1
- 5. Review the release notes for any required configuration changes
- 6. Start the Cloudreve service
- 7. Verify that WebDAV functionality works correctly with scoped accounts
- 8. Test that path traversal is no longer possible (e.g., attempting /dav/%2e%2e/ outside.txt should be denied)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-54563 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-54563 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data